Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29149868›Full record

SynthesisBMC pulmonary medicine2017

Can high-flow nasal cannula reduce the rate of reintubation in adult patients after extubation? A meta-analysis.

Yue-Nan Ni, Jian Luo, He Yu, Dan Liu, Bin-Miao Liang, Rong Yao, Zong-An Liang

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04059614 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of High-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) and Conventional Oxygen Therapy (COT) to Diaphragm Function of Post-Upper Abdominal Surgery Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorIndonesia UniversityRan2019 to 2019Enrolled66ConditionsPost Abdominal SurgeryArmsHFNC, COT
NCT05910788 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

High-Flow Nasal Catheter (HFNC) Compared With Conventional Oxygenation During the Perioperative Period of Patients Undergoing Thoracic Surgery.

TypeinterventionalSponsorFederal University of Rio Grande do SulRan2023 to 2024Enrolled90ConditionsThoracic SurgeryArmshigh flow nasal cannula
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Factors Associated With Initiation of Mechanical Ventilation in Patients With Sepsis: Retrospective Observational Study.American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses · 2023
    Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yue-Nan NiDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care, Sichuan University, No.37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Jian LuoDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care, Sichuan University, No.37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, China.
He YuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Dan LiuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Bin-Miao LiangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care, Sichuan University, No.37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Rong YaoDepartment of Emergency, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, China. 1037070596@qq.com.
Zong-An LiangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care, Sichuan University, No.37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, China. liangzatg@126.com.
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China 2013BAI09B09Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China 2015BAI12B10Sichuan Science and Technology Agency Grant 2014SZ0010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe effects of high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) on adult patients after extubation remain controversial. We aimed to further determine the effectiveness of HFNC in comparison to noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) and conventional oxygen therapy (COT).

methodsThe Pubmed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trails (CENTRAL) as well as the Information Sciences Institute (ISI) Web of Science were searched for all the controlled study comparing HFNC with NIPPV and COT in adult patients after extubation. The primary outcome was rate of reintubation and the secondary outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) mortality and length of ICU stay (ICU LOS).

resultsEight trials with a total of 2936 patients were pooled in our final studies. No significant heterogeneity was found in outcome measures. Compared with COT, HFNC was associated with lower rate of reintubation (Z = 2.97, P = 0.003), and the same result was found in the comparison between HFNC and NIPPV (Z = 0.87, P = 0.38). As for the ICU mortality and ICU LOS, we did not find any advantage of HFNC over COT or NIPPV.

conclusionsIn patients after extubation, HFNC is a reliable alternative of NIPPV to reduce rate of reintubation compared with COT.

Indexed as

CannulaIntubation, IntratrachealNoninvasive VentilationPositive-Pressure RespirationAdultAirway ExtubationHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayOxygenOxygen Inhalation TherapyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicOxygenAdultHigh flow nasal cannulaMeta-analysisMortalityPost-extubationPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID29149868
PMCPMC5693546
OpenAlexW2769954158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.