ReviewCritical care (London, England)2017
Pearls and pitfalls in comprehensive critical care echocardiography.
Review in Critical care (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inferior vena cava evaluation in fluid therapy decision making in intensive care: practical implications.Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva · 2019Pooled it
- A structured 5-question approach for echocardiographic evaluation of undifferentiated shock.Echo research and practice · 2026Review
- Positioning Statement on the Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Cardiovascular Medicine - 2026.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2026Article
- Observational
- Comparative Evaluation of Three Transthoracic Echocardiographic Techniques for Cardiac Output and Stroke Volume Assessment Across Hemodynamic States.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2026Article
- Left ventricular systolic longitudinal strain in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit: assessment of global and chamber reproducibility.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2025Article
- Review
- AI for the hemodynamic assessment of critically ill and surgical patients: focus on clinical applications.Annals of intensive care · 2025Review
- Visualizing hemodynamics: innovative graphical displays and imaging techniques in anesthesia and critical care.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Review
- Prognostic analysis of sepsis-induced myocardial injury patients using propensity score matching and doubly robust analysis with machine learning-based risk prediction model development.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Left Atrial Hemodynamics and Clinical Utility in Heart Failure.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Using echocardiography to predict fluid-responsiveness and manage the need for fluids.Intensive care medicine · 2024Article
- Speckle tracking echocardiography for diagnosis of right ventricular failure in children with totally corrected tetralogy of Fallot in Sulaimani, Iraq.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2024Article
- Role of cardiac imaging in management of heart failure.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2023Review
- Mitral regurgitation in the critically ill: the devil is in the detail.Annals of intensive care · 2023Review
- Pitfalls and Tips in the Assessment of Aortic Stenosis by Transthoracic Echocardiography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Limitations of transthoracic echocardiography in equine patients.Veterinary medicine and science · 2023Article
- Case Report: Inferior ST-Elevation on ECG Due to Pulmonary Embolism in a Patient with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and a Recent Myocardial Infarction.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2023Article
- Machine learning for the real-time assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction in critically ill patients: a bedside evaluation by novices and experts in echocardiography.Critical care (London, England) · 2022Observational
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Critical care echocardiography is developing rapidly with an increasing number of specialists now performing comprehensive studies using Doppler and other advanced techniques. However, this imaging can be challenging, interpretation is far from simple in the complex critically ill patient and mistakes can be easy to make. We aim to address clinically relevant areas where potential errors may occur and suggest methods to hopefully improve accuracy of imaging and interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.