ArticleJournal of vision2017
Numerosity estimation benefits from transsaccadic information integration.
Article in Journal of vision, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Saccade-synchronized alpha rhythms predict strength of memory trace of stimulus orientation.BMC biology · 2026Article
- Transsaccadic perception of changes in object regularity.Journal of vision · 2024Article
- Bistable perception of symbolic numbers.Journal of vision · 2024Article
- Perceptual learning across saccades: Feature but not location specific.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Familiar objects benefit more from transsaccadic feature predictions.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2023Article
- Underestimation of the number of hidden objects.Journal of vision · 2023Article
- A bias in saccadic suppression of shape change.Vision research · 2021Article
- Transsaccadic integration operates independently in different feature dimensions.Journal of vision · 2021Article
- Object-mediated overwriting across saccades.Journal of vision · 2021Article
- A review of interactions between peripheral and foveal vision.Journal of vision · 2020Review
- Stronger saccadic suppression of displacement and blanking effect in children.Journal of vision · 2020Article
- Object identity determines trans-saccadic integration.Journal of vision · 2020Article
- Spatiotopic and saccade-specific transsaccadic memory for object detail.Journal of vision · 2020Article
- Transsaccadic integration benefits are not limited to the saccade target.Journal of neurophysiology · 2019Article
- Transsaccadic integration is dominated by early, independent noise.Journal of vision · 2019Article
- Optimal trans-saccadic integration relies on visual working memory.Vision research · 2018Article
- Attention modulates trans-saccadic integration.Vision research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Humans achieve a stable and homogeneous representation of their visual environment, although visual processing varies across the visual field. Here we investigated the circumstances under which peripheral and foveal information is integrated for numerosity estimation across saccades. We asked our participants to judge the number of black and white dots on a screen. Information was presented either in the periphery before a saccade, in the fovea after a saccade, or in both areas consecutively to measure transsaccadic integration. In contrast to previous findings, we found an underestimation of numerosity for foveal presentation and an overestimation for peripheral presentation. We used a maximum-likelihood model to predict accuracy and reliability in the transsaccadic condition based on peripheral and foveal values. We found near-optimal integration of peripheral and foveal information, consistently with previous findings about orientation integration. In three consecutive experiments, we disrupted object continuity between the peripheral and foveal presentations to probe the limits of transsaccadic integration. Even for global changes on our numerosity stimuli, no influence of object discontinuity was observed. Overall, our results suggest that transsaccadic integration is a robust mechanism that also works for complex visual features such as numerosity and is operative despite internal or external mismatches between foveal and peripheral information. Transsaccadic integration facilitates an accurate and reliable perception of our environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.