Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29149613›Full record

ArticleCell2017

Tuning Biased GPCR Signaling for Physiological Gain.

Skylar Spangler, Michael R Bruchas

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cell, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. GABACurrent topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Opioid receptors: drivers to addiction?Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Skylar SpanglerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Division of Basic Research, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Michael R BruchasDepartment of Anesthesiology, Division of Basic Research, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; Division of Biology and Biomedical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; Washington University Pain Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA. Electronic address: bruchasm@wustl.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective and safe doses of opiate painkillers, like morphine, can be limited by respiratory depression. Schmid et al. (2017) now present a quantitative method to design ligands and correlate GPCR signaling bias to the dose separation between therapeutic and adverse effects in animals.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidAnimalsLigandsMorphineSignal TransductionAnalgesics, OpioidLigandsMorphine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.