Observational studyJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2018
Predictive values of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation for fluid responsiveness in patients with pneumoperitoneum.
Observational study in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Reliability of pulse pressure and stroke volume variation in assessing fluid responsiveness in the operating room: a metanalysis and a metaregression.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Pooled it
- Reliability of stroke volume or pulse pressure variation as dynamic predictors of fluid responsiveness in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2023Pooled it
- Impact of staged goal-directed fluid therapy on postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing McKeown esophagectomy: a randomized controlled trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2024Trial
- Hypotension prediction index guided versus conventional goal directed therapy to reduce intraoperative hypotension during thoracic surgery: a randomized trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2023Trial
- The predictive value of tidal volume challenge-induced hemodynamic changes for fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery with one-lung ventilation: a prospective observational study.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Observational
- The Accuracy of Dynamic Parameters for Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness in Elderly Patients with Septic Shock.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
- Comparison of pulse pressure and stroke volume variations measured by three monitors in high-risk surgical patients.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Diagnostic Efficacy of Carotid Ultrasound for Predicting the Risk of Perioperative Hypotension or Fluid Responsiveness: A Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Evaluation of fluid responsiveness with dynamic superior vena cava collapsibility index in mechanically ventilated patients.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2023Article
- Article
- Non-invasive measurement of pulse pressure variation using a finger-cuff method in obese patients having laparoscopic bariatric surgery.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2021Article
- Application of intra-abdominal pressure monitoring in early enteral nutrition after abdominal surgery.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
- Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness by Stroke Volume Variation in Children Undergoing Fontan Operation.BioMed research international · 2020Article
- Journal of clinical monitoring and computing end of year summary 2018: hemodynamic monitoring and management.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Animal studies suggest that dynamic predictors remain useful in patients with pneumoperitoneum, but human data is conflicting. Our aim was to determine predictive values of pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV) in patients with pneumoperitoneum using LiDCORapid™ haemodynamic monitor. Standardised fluid challenges of colloid were administered to patients undergoing laparoscopic procedures, one fluid challenge per patient. Intra-abdominal pressure was automatically held at 12 mmHg. Fluid responsiveness was defined as an increase in nominal stroke index (nSI) ≥ 10%. Linear regression was used to assess the ability of PPV and SVV to track the changes of nSI and logistic regression and area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) to assess the predictive value of PPV and SVV for fluid responsiveness. Threshold values for PPV and SVV were obtained using the "gray zone" approach. A p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. 56 patients were included in analysis. 41 patients (73%) responded to fluids. Both PPV and SVV tracked changes in nSI (Spearman correlation coefficients 0.34 for PPV and 0.53 for SVV). Odds ratio for fluid responsiveness for PPV was 1.163 (95% CI 1.01-1.34) and for SVV 1.341 (95% CI 1.10-1.63). PPV achieved an AUROC of 0.674 (95% CI 0.518-0.830) and SVV 0.80 (95% CI 0.668-0.932). The gray zone of PPV ranged between 6.5 and 20.5% and that of SVV between 7.5 and 13%. During pneumoperitoneum, as measured by LiDCORapid™, PPV and SVV can predict fluid responsiveness, however their sensitivity is lower than the one reported in conditions without pneumoperitoneum. Trial registry number: (with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry): ACTRN12612000456853.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29149433What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.