Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29149395›Full record

ReviewChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2017

Shaken baby syndrome: what certainty do we have?

Matthieu Vinchon

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Abusive Head Trauma Animal Models: Focus on Biomarkers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. The legal challenges to the diagnosis of shaken baby syndrome or how to counter 12 common fake news.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Shaken baby syndrome is real.Pediatric radiology · 2018
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthieu VinchonDepartment of Pediatric Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Hôpital Roger Salengro, 59037, Lille Cedex, France. mvinchon@yahoo.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9122-6165
Hôpital Roger Salengro · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShaken baby syndrome is a common and devastating disease in infants. In spite of its frequency, many controversies persist, regarding the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. AIM OF THE STUDY: We reviewed several salient and challenging issues related to SBS, like its pathogenesis, predisposing factors, differential diagnosis, and prevention programs. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe derive arguments from the literature and from our prospective registry of accidental and non-accidental traumas in infants.

conclusionsMuch remains to be understood in SBS, and prevention programs for this entirely man-made disaster are still in their infancy. Pediatric neurosurgeons should be involved actively in the medical management and research on SBS.

Indexed as

Shaken Baby SyndromeCausalityHumansInfantChild abuseInfantile subdural hematomaPathophysiologyPrevention program

Identifiers

PMID29149395
OpenAlexW2752333538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.