Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29149385›Full record

ReviewChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2017

Pre-clinical models in pediatric traumatic brain injury-challenges and lessons learned.

Patrick M Kochanek, Jessica S Wallisch, Hülya Bayır, Robert S B Clark

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Abusive Head Trauma Animal Models: Focus on Biomarkers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Animal models of pediatric abusive head trauma.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Patrick M KochanekDepartments of Critical Care Medicine, Anesthesiology, Pediatrics, Bioengineering, and Clinical and Translational Science, Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, John G. Rangos Research Center, 4401 Penn Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15224, USA. kochanekpm@ccm.upmc.edu.
Jessica S WallischSafar Center for Resuscitation Research, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, 4401 Penn Ave, Pittsburgh, PA, 15224, USA.
Hülya BayırSafar Center for Resuscitation Research, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, 4401 Penn Ave, Pittsburgh, PA, 15224, USA.
Robert S B ClarkSafar Center for Resuscitation Research, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, 4401 Penn Ave, Pittsburgh, PA, 15224, USA.

Funding

PEDIATRIC NEUROINTENSIVE CARE AND RESUSCITATION RESEARCHT32HD040686 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Robert S B Clark, PATRICK M KOCHANEK · 2000 to 2026
$7.1M
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development T32 HD 040686NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD040686
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite the enormity of the problem and the lack of new therapies, research in the pre-clinical arena specifically using pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) models is limited. In this review, some of the key models addressing both the age spectrum of pediatric TBI and its unique injury mechanisms will be highlighted. Four topics will be addressed, namely, (1) unique facets of the developing brain important to TBI model development, (2) a description of some of the most commonly used pre-clinical models of severe pediatric TBI including work in both rodents and large animals, (3) a description of the pediatric models of mild TBI and repetitive mild TBI that are relatively new, and finally (4) a discussion of challenges, gaps, and potential future directions to further advance work in pediatric TBI models.

methodsThis narrative review on the topic of pediatric TBI models was based on review of PUBMED/Medline along with a synthesis of information on key factors in pre-clinical and clinical developmental brain injury that influence TBI modeling.

resultsIn the contemporary literature, six types of models have been used in rats including weight drop, fluid percussion injury (FPI), impact acceleration, controlled cortical impact (CCI), mechanical shaking, and closed head modifications of CCI. In mice, studies are largely restricted to CCI. In large animals, FPI and rotational injury have been used in piglets and shake injury has also been used in lambs. Most of the studies have been in severe injury models, although more recently, studies have begun to explore mild and repetitive mild injuries to study concussion.

conclusionsGiven the emerging importance of TBI in infants and children, the morbidity and mortality that is produced, along with its purported link to the development of chronic neurodegenerative diseases, studies in these models merit greater systematic investigations along with consortium-type approaches and long-term follow-up to translate new therapies to the bedside.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsBrain Injuries, TraumaticChild, PreschoolDatabases, BibliographicHumansInfantAbusive head traumaApoptosisAxonal injuryDevelopmentalExcitotoxicityHead traumaImmatureInflammationOxidative stressShaken baby syndrome

Identifiers

PMID29149385
PMCPMC5909721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.