Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29149326›Full record

ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2018

Virtually 'in the heat of the moment': insula activation in safe sex negotiation among risky men.

Benjamin J Smith, Feng Xue, Vita Droutman, Emily Barkley-Levenson, A James Melrose, Lynn C Miller, John R Monterosso, Antoine Bechara, Paul R Appleby, John L Christensen and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Introducing the Glutamate-Amplifies-Noradrenergic-Effects (GANE) Model to the Neurocognitive Study of Emotion-Related Impulsivity.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Benjamin J SmithUniversity of Southern California Department of Psychology, Los Angeles, CA 90089-1061, USA.
Feng XueUniversity of California at San Diego School of Medicine Radiology Department, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Vita DroutmanUniversity of Southern California Department of Psychology, Los Angeles, CA 90089-1061, USA.
Emily Barkley-LevensonHofstra University Department of Psychology, Hempstead, NY 11549, USA.
A James MelroseUniversity of Southern California Department of Psychology, Los Angeles, CA 90089-1061, USA.
Lynn C MillerUniversity of Southern California, Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism and Department of Psychology, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
John R MonterossoUniversity of Southern California Department of Psychology, Los Angeles, CA 90089-1061, USA.
Antoine BecharaUniversity of Southern California Department of Psychology, Los Angeles, CA 90089-1061, USA.
Paul R ApplebyUniversity of Southern California, Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
John L ChristensenUniversity of Connecticut Department of Communication, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.
Carlos G GodoyUniversity of Southern California, Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
Stephen J ReadUniversity of Southern California Department of Psychology, Los Angeles, CA 90089-1061, USA.

Funding

Neural Mechanisms of Risky Sexual Decision-Making in METH and non-METH Using MSMR01DA031626 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI READ, STEPHEN J · 2011 to 2015
$2.4M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA031626
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

HIV is most prevalent among men who have sex with men (MSM), and although most MSM use condoms consistently during casual sex, some take risks. To better understand the psychology of those risky decisions, we examined neural correlates of playing a virtual sexual 'hook up' game in an functional magnetic resonance imaging scanner in MSM who had, in the past 90 days, been sexually risky (N = 76) or safe (N = 31). We found that during potentially risky sexual choices, previously risky MSM had more right insula activity than previously safe MSM. Real-life sexual risk was related to trait positive and negative urgency. Insula activity that differentiated risky and safe MSM was related to trait positive and negative urgency. Future work should further examine if, and to what extent, insula activation during safe sex negotiation drives MSM's rash risky sexual decision-making.

Indexed as

Unsafe SexAdolescentAdultCerebral CortexDecision MakingDominance, CerebralHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleHumansLibidoMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNegotiatingSafe SexSexual PartnersStatistics as TopicfMRIinsulamen who have sex with mennegative urgencyrisky decision-makingsexual health

Identifiers

PMID29149326
PMCPMC5793727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.