Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29149207›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Evolution of the metabolome in response to selection for increased immunity in populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Navdeep Gogna, Rakesh Sharma, Vanika Gupta, Kavita Dorai, N G Prasad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Navdeep GognaDepartment of Physical Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education & Research IISER, Mohali, Punjab, India.
Rakesh SharmaDepartment of Physical Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education & Research IISER, Mohali, Punjab, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6169-1464
Vanika GuptaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education & Research IISER, Mohali, Punjab, India.
Kavita DoraiDepartment of Physical Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education & Research IISER, Mohali, Punjab, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9876-4839
N G PrasadDepartment of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education & Research IISER, Mohali, Punjab, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0410-5518

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We used NMR-based metabolomics to test two hypotheses-(i) there will be evolved differences in the metabolome of selected and control populations even under un-infected conditions and (ii) post infection, the metabolomes of the selected and control populations will respond differently. We selected replicate populations of Drosophila melanogaster for increased survivorship (I) against a gram-negative pathogen. We subjected the selected (I) and their control populations (S) to three different treatments: (1) infected with heat-killed bacteria (i), (2) sham infected (s), and (3) untreated (u). We performed 1D and 2D NMR experiments to identify the metabolic differences. Multivariate analysis of the metabolic profiles of the untreated (Iu and Su) flies yielded higher concentrations of lipids, organic acids, sugars, amino acids, NAD and AMP in the Iu treatment as compared to the Su treatment, showing that even in the absence of infection, the metabolome of the I and S regimes was different. In the S and I regimes, post infection/injury, concentration of metabolites directly or indirectly associated with energy related pathways (lipids, organic acids, sugars) declined while the concentration of metabolites that are probably associated with immune response (amino acids) increased. However, in most cases, the I regime flies had a higher concentration of such metabolites even under un-infected conditions. The change in the metabolite concentration upon infection/injury was not always comparable between I and S regimes (in case of lactate, alanine, leucine, lysine, threonine) indicating that the I and S regimes had evolved to respond differentially to infection and to injury.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAdenosine MonophosphateAmino AcidsAnimalsDisease ResistanceDrosophila melanogasterFemaleImmunity, InnateLipidsMaleMetabolomeMetabolomicsMultivariate AnalysisNADPrincipal Component AnalysisPseudomonasAdenosine MonophosphateAmino AcidsLipidsNADSugars

Identifiers

PMID29149207
PMCPMC5693281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.