ArticlePloS one2017
Comparison between public and private sectors of care and disparities in adverse neonatal outcomes following emergency intrapartum cesarean at term - A retrospective cohort study.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes and Health System Costs in Standard Public Maternity Care Compared to Private Obstetric-Led Care: A Population-Level Matched Cohort Study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026Observational
- Social determinants of health and language outcomes in preterm infants with public and private insurance.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025Article
- Adverse Neonatal Outcomes and Associated Risk Factors: A Case-Control Study.Global pediatric health · 2022Article
- Determinants of neonatal mortality among neonates admitted to neonatal intensive care unit of Dessie comprehensive and specialized hospital, Northeast Ethiopia; An unmatched case-control study.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Utility of the 5-Minute Apgar Score as a Research Endpoint.American journal of epidemiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPerinatal outcomes may be influenced by a variety of factors including maternal demographics and medical condition as well as socio-economic status. The evidence for disparities in health outcomes stratified by type of care (public or private) is lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate short term neonatal outcomes following category 1 and 2 emergency cesareans at term between publicly and privately funded women at a single major tertiary centre in Australia. Category 1-immediate threat to life (maternal or fetal); Category 2-maternal or fetal compromise that is not immediately life-threatening.
methodsThis was a retrospective, cross sectional study of 61355 term singleton babies born at the Mater Mother's Hospital in Brisbane, Australia in 2007-2014. We collected data from the hospital's maternity database and compared maternal demographics, indications for cesarean and neonatal outcomes for publicly and privately funded women.
resultsOver the study period there were 32477 public and 28878 private, term singleton births. Compared to the publicly funded cohort, privately insured women were older, had lower BMI, were of Caucasian ethnicity, Australian born, nulliparous, had shorter labors and had lower rates of hypertensive disorders and diabetes. The most common indications for category 1 and category 2 cesareans in combination were non-reassuring fetal status followed by failure to progress in labor and malpresentation. For both category 1 and 2 cesareans, neonatal outcomes (Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes, abnormal cord gases, Neonatal Critical Care Unit admission rates, rates of severe respiratory distress and jaundice) were significantly worse in the publicly funded compared to the privately insured cohort Multivariate analyses controlling for maternal age, ethnicity, country of birth, parity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, gestational age at birth and length of labour confirmed that private insurance status was highly protective for the perinatal outcomes of Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes (aOR 0.26, 95% CI 0.13-0.55), admission to NCCU (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.30-0.92) and respiratory distress (aOR 0.60, 95% CI 0.41-0.86).
conclusionBirth in the private health sector was inversely associated with adverse neonatal outcomes following category 1 and 2 cesareans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.