Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29149038›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2017

Adherence to Hunger Training over 6 Months and the Effect on Weight and Eating Behaviour: Secondary Analysis of a Randomised Controlled Trial.

Michelle R Jospe, Rachael W Taylor, Josie Athens, Melyssa Roy, Rachel C Brown

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle R JospeDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand. michelle.jospe@otago.ac.nz.ORCID 0000-0003-0393-5517
Rachael W TaylorDepartment of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand. rachael.taylor@otago.ac.nz.
Josie AthensDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand. josie.athens@otago.ac.nz.
Melyssa RoyDepartment of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand. melyssa.roy@otago.ac.nz.ORCID 0000-0003-1399-3091
Rachel C BrownDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand. rachel.brown@otago.ac.nz.
University of Otago · NZCancer Society of New Zealand · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring blood glucose prior to eating can teach individuals to eat only when truly hungry, but how adherence to 'hunger training' influences weight loss and eating behaviour is uncertain. This exploratory, secondary analysis from a larger randomized controlled trial examined five indices of adherence to 'hunger training', chosen a priori, to examine which adherence measure best predicted weight loss over 6 months. We subsequently explored how the best measure of adherence influenced eating behavior in terms of intuitive and emotional eating. Retention was 72% (

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorHungerWeight LossAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedadherenceblood glucose self-monitoringfood intake regulationhungerobesity

Identifiers

PMID29149038
PMCPMC5707732
OpenAlexW2769582836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.