Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29148920›Full record

ReviewViral immunology2018

The Unexpected Impact of Vaccines on Secondary Bacterial Infections Following Influenza.

Amber M Smith, Victor C Huber

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viral immunology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Validated Models of Immune Response to Virus Infection.Current opinion in systems biology · 2018
    Article
  19. [Some thoughts on influenza vaccine and regular influenza vaccination for healthcare workers].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2018
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amber M Smith1 Department of Pediatrics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center , Memphis, Tennessee.
Victor C Huber2 Division of Basic Biomedical Sciences, University of South Dakota , Vermillion, South Dakota.
University of South Dakota · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

Wichozani-A Healthy Lifestyle for Rural American Indian Youth through Cultural and Physical Activities: A Community-Based Participatory Research StudyP20GM103443 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA · PI Victor Chester Huber · 2012 to 2026
$58.1M
Production of therapeutic human polyclonal antibodies against influenza virusesR44AI117976 · NIAID · SAB BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC. · PI BAUSCH, CHRISTOPH, HUBER, VICTOR CHESTER · 2016 to 2017
$1.4M
Quantifying and Validating Immune Response Dynamics for Influenza and Viral-Bacterial PneumoniasR56AI125324 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI SMITH, AMBER M · 2016 to 2016
$454k
NIAID NIH HHS R44 AI117976NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI125324NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103443
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Influenza virus infections remain a significant health burden worldwide, despite available vaccines. Factors that contribute to this include a lack of broad coverage by current vaccines and continual emergence of novel virus strains. Further complicating matters, when influenza viruses infect a host, severe infections can develop when bacterial pathogens invade. Secondary bacterial infections (SBIs) contribute to a significant proportion of influenza-related mortality, with Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, and Haemophilus influenzae as major coinfecting pathogens. Vaccines against bacterial pathogens can reduce coinfection incidence and severity, but few vaccines are available and those that are, may have decreased efficacy in influenza virus-infected hosts. While some studies indicate a benefit of vaccine-induced immunity in providing protection against SBIs, a comprehensive understanding is lacking. In this review, we discuss the current knowledge of viral and bacterial vaccine availability, the generation of protective immunity from these vaccines, and the effectiveness in limiting influenza-associated bacterial infections.

Indexed as

Bacterial VaccinesHaemophilus InfectionsHumansInfluenza, HumanPneumonia, BacterialStaphylococcal InfectionsStreptococcal InfectionsBacterial Vaccinesinfluenzaprotective immunitysecondary bacterial infections

Identifiers

PMID29148920
PMCPMC5863092
OpenAlexW2768858738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.