Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29148348›Full record

ArticleMedical care research and review : MCRR2019

Increasing Trends in the Use of Hospital Observation Services for Older Medicare Advantage and Privately Insured Patients.

Keith D Lind, Claire M Noel-Miller, Lindsey R Sangaralingham, Nilay D Shah, Erik P Hess, Pamela Morin, M Fernanda Bellolio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical care research and review : MCRR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Keith D Lind1 AARP Public Policy Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
Claire M Noel-Miller1 AARP Public Policy Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
Lindsey R Sangaralingham2 Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Nilay D Shah2 Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Erik P Hess2 Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Pamela Morin3 OptumLabs, Cambridge, MA, USA.
M Fernanda Bellolio2 Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Policy and financial pressures have driven up use of observation stays for patients in traditional Medicare and the Veterans' Affairs Healthcare System. Using claims data (2004-2014) from OptumLabs™ Data Warehouse, we examined whether people in private Medicare Advantage (MA) and commercial plans experienced similar changes. We found that use of observation increased rapidly for patients in MA plans-even though MA plans were not subject to the same pressures as government-run programs. In contrast, use of observation remained constant for people in commercial plans-except for enrollees 65 and older, for whom it increased somewhat. Privately insured patients returning to the hospital after an inpatient stay were increasingly likely to be placed under observation. Our results suggest that observation is rapidly replacing inpatient admissions and readmissions for many older patients in MA and commercial plans, while younger patients continue to be admitted as inpatients at relatively constant rates.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge FactorsDatabases, FactualFemaleHospitalizationHospitalsHumansInpatientsInsurance CoverageInsurance, HealthMaleMedicare Part CMiddle AgedPatient ReadmissionRetrospective Studiesage-based dispositiondivergent trendsmedicare advantageobservation statusreadmission substitute

Identifiers

PMID29148348
PMCPMC6388413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.