Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29148313›Full record

ArticleHealth informatics journal2019

Facebook and Twitter vaccine sentiment in response to measles outbreaks.

Michael S Deiner, Cherie Fathy, Jessica Kim, Katherine Niemeyer, David Ramirez, Sarah F Ackley, Fengchen Liu, Thomas M Lietman, Travis C Porco

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health informatics journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mapping the Mpox discourse: A network and sentiment analysis.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Examining Vaccine Sentiment on Twitter and Local Vaccine Deployment during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michael S DeinerUniversity of California, San Francisco, USA.
Cherie FathyVanderbilt University, USA.
Jessica KimUniversity of California, San Francisco, USA.
Katherine NiemeyerIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, USA.
David RamirezUniversity of California, San Francisco, USA.
Sarah F AckleyUniversity of California, San Francisco, USA.
Fengchen LiuUniversity of California, San Francisco, USA.
Thomas M LietmanUniversity of California, San Francisco, USA.
Travis C PorcoUniversity of California, San Francisco, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Rapid-Prototyping and Design CoreP30EY002162 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LAMBA, DEEPAK ASHOK · 1985 to 2024
$16.8M
"Modeling contact investigation and rapid response"U01GM087728 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI PORCO, TRAVIS CHRISTIAN · 2011 to 2015
$2.2M
Digital Detection of Infectious Eye EpidemicsR01EY024608 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LIETMAN, THOMAS M · 2016 to 2019
$1.5M
Application of Branching Processes to Measles in CaliforniaF31GM120985 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ACKLEY, SARAH · 2016 to 2017
$77k
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY002162NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024608NIGMS NIH HHS F31 GM120985NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM087728
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social media posts regarding measles vaccination were classified as pro-vaccination, expressing vaccine hesitancy, uncertain, or irrelevant. Spearman correlations with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-reported measles cases and differenced smoothed cumulative case counts over this period were reported (using time series bootstrap confidence intervals). A total of 58,078 Facebook posts and 82,993 tweets were identified from 4 January 2009 to 27 August 2016. Pro-vaccination posts were correlated with the US weekly reported cases (Facebook: Spearman correlation 0.22 (95% confidence interval: 0.09 to 0.34), Twitter: 0.21 (95% confidence interval: 0.06 to 0.34)). Vaccine-hesitant posts, however, were uncorrelated with measles cases in the United States (Facebook: 0.01 (95% confidence interval: -0.13 to 0.14), Twitter: 0.0011 (95% confidence interval: -0.12 to 0.12)). These findings may result from more consistent social media engagement by individuals expressing vaccine hesitancy, contrasted with media- or event-driven episodic interest on the part of individuals favoring current policy.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksHumansMeaslesSocial MediaUnited StatesVaccinationmeaslespatient compliancesocial mediatreatment refusalvaccination

Identifiers

PMID29148313
PMCPMC5930144
OpenAlexW2770259901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.