Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29147981›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2018

Low atrazine dosages reduce sperm quality of Calomys laucha mice.

Graciela Quintana Saalfeld, Antônio Sergio Varela Junior, Tiane Castro, Fernanda Alves Pereira, Stela Mari Meneghello Gheller, Alessandra Cardoso da Silva, Carine Dahl Corcini, Carlos Eduardo da Rosa, Elton Pinto Colares

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Atrazine exposure in gestation and breastfeeding affects Calomys laucha sperm cells.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Graciela Quintana SaalfeldPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Fisiológicas, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG), Avenida Itália, km 08 s/n, Caixa Postal 474, Rio Grande, RS, 96201-900, Brazil. graciqs@gmail.com.
Antônio Sergio Varela JuniorReprodução Animal Comparada, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG), Rio Grande, RS, Brazil.
Tiane CastroPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Fisiológicas, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG), Avenida Itália, km 08 s/n, Caixa Postal 474, Rio Grande, RS, 96201-900, Brazil.
Fernanda Alves PereiraReprodução Animal Comparada, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG), Rio Grande, RS, Brazil.
Stela Mari Meneghello GhellerReprodução Animal Comparada, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG), Rio Grande, RS, Brazil.
Alessandra Cardoso da SilvaReproPel, Faculdade de Veterinária, Campus Capão do Leão, Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Carine Dahl CorciniReprodução Animal Comparada, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG), Rio Grande, RS, Brazil.
Carlos Eduardo da RosaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Fisiológicas, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG), Avenida Itália, km 08 s/n, Caixa Postal 474, Rio Grande, RS, 96201-900, Brazil.
Elton Pinto ColaresReprodução Animal Comparada, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG), Rio Grande, RS, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande · BRUniversidade Federal de Pelotas · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reproductive effects caused by the exposure to environmentally relevant dosages of atrazine on wild animals are poorly understood. This study evaluated the effects of three dosages of atrazine on sperm parameters of adult Calomys laucha males. Adult mice were orally exposed to dosages of 0 (water and vehicle control), 0.1, 1, and 10 mg/kg of animal weight for a 21-day period. Following exposure, analyses were performed to determine sperm motility parameters, plasma membrane integrity and fluidity, mitochondrial functionality, acrosome integrity, DNA damage, lipid peroxidation, and production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the sperm samples. Total and progressive motility were reduced in all dosages in comparison to control groups. Membrane integrity and mitochondrial functionality of sperm were reduced in all dosages, and the sperm membrane fluidity increased in the higher dosages of atrazine (1 and 10 mg/kg), in comparison with the vehicle control. A decrease in the acrosome integrity was noted at 10 mg/kg of atrazine, compared to the control groups. The integrity of DNA, ROS generation, and lipid peroxidation of sperm showed no significant differences when compared with the control groups. These results suggest that exposure to low dosages of atrazine can affect sperm parameters of Calomys laucha and therefore reduce the reproductive capacity of wild rodent species.

Indexed as

AnimalsAtrazineDose-Response Relationship, DrugEndocrine DisruptorsEnvironmental MonitoringLipid PeroxidationMaleMembrane FluidityMiceMitochondriaReactive Oxygen SpeciesReproductionSpermatozoaSperm MotilityAtrazineEndocrine DisruptorsReactive Oxygen SpeciesAtrazineCalomys lauchaHerbicideSperm motilitySperm parametersWild rodent

Identifiers

PMID29147981
OpenAlexW2769856234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.