Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29147853›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2018

Biospecimen donation among black and white breast cancer survivors: opportunities to promote precision medicine.

Vanessa B Sheppard, Alejandra Hurtado-de-Mendoza, Yun-Ling Zheng, Ying Wang, Kristi D Graves, Tania Lobo, Hanfei Xu, Yvonne Jennings, Dennis Tolsma, Martha Trout and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Race and Patient-reported Symptoms in Adherence to Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy: A Report from the Women's Hormonal Initiation and Persistence Study.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Sociodemographic, clinical, psychosocial, and healthcare-related factors associated with beliefs about adjuvant endocrine therapy among breast cancer survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Vanessa B SheppardSchool of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA. vanessa.sheppard@vcuhealth.org.
Alejandra Hurtado-de-MendozaLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Yun-Ling ZhengLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Ying WangLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Kristi D GravesLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Tania LoboLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Hanfei XuLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Yvonne JenningsSchool of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Dennis TolsmaKaiser Permanente Georgia, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Martha TroutSoutheast Permanente Medical Group, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Brandi E RobinsonKaiser Permanente Georgia, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Brittany McKinnonHenry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
Mahlet TadesseLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Georgetown University · USGeorgetown University Medical Center · USKaiser Permanente · USVirginia Commonwealth University · USHenry Ford Health System · USSoutheast · US

Funding

Tissue Culture Shared ResourceP30CA051008 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHEN W BYERS · 1990 to 2026
$71.5M
Virus Vector Shared ResourceP30CA016059 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI Keri R Maher · 1985 to 2026
$51.0M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR001432 · NCATS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI UMANS, JASON G · 2015 to 2024
$7.5M
Telomere dysfunction, chromosome 9 instability and bladder cancer riskR01CA132996 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI ZHENG, YUN-LING · 2009 to 2013
$2.7M
PREDICTORS OF ADJUVANT ENDOCRINE THERAPY ADHERENCE IN WOMEN WITH BREAST CANCERR01CA154848 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI SHEPPARD, VANESSA B · 2011 to 2015
$2.5M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001432NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016059NCI NIH HHS P30 CA51008NCI NIH HHS R01 CA132996NCI NIH HHS R01 CA154848NCI NIH HHS R01CA154848
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAdvances in precision medicine (PM) have potential to reduce and/or eliminate breast cancer disparities in both treatment and survivorship. However, compared to white Americans, black Americans are often underrepresented in genetic research. This report assessed factors that influence receipt of buccal cells via saliva kits.

methodsThis prospective study recruited women with confirmed hormonal-positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC). A standardized telephone survey collected sociodemographic, socio-cultural (e.g., religiosity), and healthcare process factors. Clinical information was abstracted from medical records. After the baseline survey, return postage-paid envelopes and mouthwash collection kits were mailed. Univariate and adjusted logistic regression models estimated the probability of biospecimen donation.

resultsSeventy percent of the sample provided buccal cells which were of good quality. No differences were noted by race or other demographic factors. In the multivariable logistic model, time spent with providers (OR 1.61 per 1-point increase; 95% CI 1.242, 2.088) and religiosity (OR 0.957 per 1-point increase; 95% CI 0.931, 0.984) remained associated with biospecimen provision. Women with lower-stage cancer (vs. higher stage III+) were more likely to donate biospecimens (p < 0.05).

conclusionsCancer care experiences predicted specimen donation. Understanding the contextual reasons for lower receipt among women with higher religiosity scores and higher stage warrants further examination. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: PM is relevant to cancer survivors because of its potential to inform targeted therapies, understand disease resistance, and aide in prediction of toxicity and/or recurrence. Future efforts to launch precision medicine trials with BC survivors may benefit from engaging medical oncologists and/or leveraging patient-provider encounters for trial participation.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiological Specimen BanksBlack or African AmericanBreast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPrecision MedicineSpecimen HandlingWhite PeopleBiospecimenDisparitiesPrecision medicineSurvivors

Identifiers

PMID29147853
OpenAlexW2769539295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.