Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29147852›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2018

Enhanced Peptide Detection Toward Single-Neuron Proteomics by Reversed-Phase Fractionation Capillary Electrophoresis Mass Spectrometry.

Sam B Choi, Camille Lombard-Banek, Pablo Muñoz-LLancao, M Chiara Manzini, Peter Nemes

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sam B ChoiDepartment of Chemistry, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, 20052, USA.
Camille Lombard-BanekDepartment of Chemistry, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, 20052, USA.
Pablo Muñoz-LLancaoInstitute for Neuroscience, Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, 20052, USA.
M Chiara ManziniInstitute for Neuroscience, Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, 20052, USA.
Peter NemesDepartment of Chemistry, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, 20052, USA. nemes@umd.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4704-4997
George Washington University · US

Funding

American Society for Mass Spectrometry Research AwardArnold and Mabel Beckman Foundation Young Investigator GrantCosmos Club Foundation FellowshipDuPont Young Professor Award
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to detect peptides and proteins in single cells is vital for understanding cell heterogeneity in the nervous system. Capillary electrophoresis (CE) nanoelectrospray ionization (nanoESI) provides high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) with trace-level sensitivity, but compressed separation during CE challenges protein identification by tandem HRMS with limited MS/MS duty cycle. Here, we supplemented ultrasensitive CE-nanoESI-HRMS with reversed-phase (RP) fractionation to enhance identifications from protein digest amounts that approximate to a few mammalian neurons. An ~1 to 20 μg neuronal protein digest was fractionated on a RP column (ZipTip), and 1 ng to 500 pg of peptides were analyzed by a custom-built CE-HRMS system. Compared with the control (no fractionation), RP fractionation improved CE separation (theoretical plates ~274,000 versus 412,000 maximum, resp.), which enhanced detection sensitivity (2.5-fold higher signal-to-noise ratio), minimized co-isolation spectral interferences during MS/MS, and increased the temporal rate of peptide identification by up to ~57%. From 1 ng of protein digest (<5 neurons), CE with RP fractionation identified 737 protein groups (1,753 peptides), or ~480 protein groups (~1,650 peptides) on average per analysis. The approach was scalable to 500 pg of protein digest (~a single neuron), identifying 225 protein groups (623 peptides) in technical triplicates, or 141 protein groups on average per analysis. Among identified proteins, 101 proteins were products of genes that are known to be transcriptionally active in single neurons during early development of the brain, including those involved in synaptic transmission and plasticity and cytoskeletal organization. Graphical abstract ᅟ.

Indexed as

AnimalsChromatography, Reverse-PhaseElectrophoresis, CapillaryMice, Inbred C57BLNeuronsPeptidesProteinsProteomicsSpectrometry, Mass, Electrospray IonizationPeptidesProteinsBottom-up proteomicsCapillary electrophoresisCentral nervous systemFractionationHippocampusMass spectrometryMouseNeurons

Identifiers

PMID29147852
OpenAlexW2769741072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.