Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29147773›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2018

Extraperitoneal sigmoidostomy: a surgical approach with less complications and better functions for abdominoperineal resection of rectal cancer.

Peng Wang, Jianwei Liang, Haitao Zhou, Zheng Wang, Lei Shi, Zhixiang Zhou

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 80% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peng WangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Jianwei LiangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Haitao ZhouDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China. 42466723@qq.com.
Zheng WangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Lei ShiDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Zhixiang ZhouDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China. zhouzx001@163.com.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

The Capital Health Research and Development of Special 2016-2-4022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study is to explore the safety and function of extraperitoneal sigmoidostomy for patients with rectal cancer who underwent abdominoperineal resection.

methodsWe systematically reviewed records of patients with rectal cancer who underwent abdominoperineal resection and extraperitoneal or intraperitoneal sigmoidostomy from January 2010 to December 2014 at our department. They were grouped into the extraperitoneal (group A) and intraperitoneal sigmoidostomy (group B) groups. Clinical data were collected and statistically analyzed.

resultsA total of 231 consecutive cases were included: 108 cases in group A and 123 in group B. Patient demographics were similar in both groups. Group A was associated with less time for sigmoidostomy (19.6 ± 2.8 vs. 27.0 ± 4.5 min, p < 0.001), shorter postoperative hospitalization (6.4 ± 1.3 vs. 6.9 ± 1.6 days, p = 0.036), less incidence of stoma-related complications (p = 0.002) and less possibility of re-operation related to stomal complications (p = 0.037). Functions of stoma including stimulation of excrement, stimulating time for excrement, frequency of excrement, self-controlled ability of excrement, and regularity of excrement were all better than those in group B patients (p < 0.001, < 0.001, 0.018, 0.004, and 0.001, respectively). Patients in group A had less psychological problems including anxiety (p = 0.008), depression (p = 0.045), and impaired social interaction (p = 0.010).

conclusionsExtraperitoneal sigmoidostomy is associated with shorter operative duration and postoperative hospitalization and has fewer complications and better outcome for abdominoperineal resection of rectal cancer, and patients also had less psychological problems.

Indexed as

AbdomenAdultAgedAged, 80 and overColon, SigmoidDemographyEnterostomyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerineumPeritoneumPostoperative ComplicationsRectal NeoplasmsSurgical StomasAbdominoperineal resectionComplicationExtraperitoneal sigmoidostomyIntraperitoneal sigmoidostomyRectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID29147773
OpenAlexW2768239272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.