Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29147758›Full record

SynthesisRheumatology international2018

A systematic review assessing non-pharmacological conservative treatment studies for people with non-inflammatory multi-joint pain: clinical outcomes and research design considerations.

C Comer, T O Smith, B Drew, R Raja, S R Kingsbury, Philip G Conaghan

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Rheumatology international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

C ComerExtended Scope Physiotherapy Practitioner, Leeds Community Healthcare Musculoskeletal and Rehabilitation Services, Leeds, UK.
T O SmithPhysiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
B DrewLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
R RajaChristchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand.
S R KingsburyLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Philip G ConaghanLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. p.conaghan@leeds.ac.uk.
University of Leeds · GBChristchurch Hospital · NZLeeds Community Healthcare NHS Trust · GBNIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GB

Funding

Arthritis Research UK 20083National Institute for Health Research CDRF -2013-04-044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To systematically review the evidence to determine the clinical outcomes and the important methodological quality features of interventional studies on adults with non-inflammatory multi-joint pain (MJP). Systematic search of published and unpublished literature using the databases: AMED, CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, psycINFO, SPORTDiscus, PEDro, OpenGrey, the EU Clinical Trials Register, World Health Organization International Clinical Trial Registry Platform, ClinicalTrials.gov and the ISRCTN registry (search: inception to 19th October 2017). All papers reporting the clinical outcomes of non-pharmacological interventions for people with non-inflammatory MJP were included. Studies were critically appraised using the Downs and Black Critical Appraisal and the TIDieR reporting checklists. Data were analysed using a Best Evidence Synthesis approach. From 3824 citations, four papers satisfied the eligibility criteria. Three studies reported outcomes from multidisciplinary rehabilitation programmes and one study reported the findings of a spa therapy intervention. All interventions significantly improved pain, function and quality of life in the short-term. There was limited reporting of measures for absenteeism, presenteeism and psychosocial outcomes. The evidence was 'weak', and due to a lack of controlled trials, there is limited evidence to ascertain treatment effectiveness. Design consideration for future trials surround improved reporting of participant characteristics, interventions and the standardisation of core outcome measures. There is insufficient high-quality trial data to determine the effectiveness of treatments for non-inflammatory MJP. Given the significant health burden which this condition presents on both individuals and wider society, developing and testing interventions and accurately reporting these, should be a research priority. Registration PROSPERO (CRD42013005888).

Indexed as

Research DesignAdultAgedArthralgiaBenchmarkingClinical Trials as TopicConservative TreatmentEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeRecovery of FunctionTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultArthritisClinical TrialPainResearch designTherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID29147758
PMCPMC5847069
OpenAlexW2770493445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.