Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29147731›Full record

Trial reportExperimental brain research2018

The influence of cervical movement on eye stabilization reflexes: a randomized trial.

Britta K Ischebeck, Jurryt de Vries, Jan Paul van Wingerden, Gert Jan Kleinrensink, Maarten A Frens, Jos N van der Geest

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Experimental brain research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Britta K IschebeckDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0801-5242
Jurryt de VriesDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3600-8031
Jan Paul van WingerdenSpine & Joint Centre, Noordsingel 113, Rotterdam, 3035 EM, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1490-5594
Gert Jan KleinrensinkDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9073-3181
Maarten A FrensDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0752-2034
Jos N van der GeestDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. j.vandergeest@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-2870-4208
Erasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate the influence of the amount of cervical movement on the cervico-ocular reflex (COR) and vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) in healthy individuals. Eye stabilization reflexes, especially the COR, are changed in neck pain patients. In healthy humans, the strength of the VOR and the COR are inversely related. In a cross-over trial the amplitude of the COR and VOR (measured with a rotational chair with eye tracking device) and the active cervical range of motion (CROM) was measured in 20 healthy participants (mean age 24.7). The parameters were tested before and after two different interventions (hyperkinesia: 20 min of extensive active neck movement; and hypokinesia: 60 min of wearing a stiff neck collar). In an additional replication experiment the effect of prolonged (120 min) hypokinesia on the eye reflexes were tested in 11 individuals. The COR did not change after 60 min of hypokinesia, but did increase after prolonged hypokinesia (median change 0.220; IQR 0.168, p = 0.017). The VOR increased after 60 min of hypokinesia (median change 0.155, IQR 0.26, p = 0.003), but this increase was gone after 120 min of hypokinesia. Both reflexes were unaffected by cervical hyperkinesia. Diminished neck movements influences both the COR and VOR, although on a different time scale. However, increased neck movements do not affect the reflexes. These findings suggest that diminished neck movements could cause the increased COR in patients with neck complaints.

Indexed as

AdultEye MovementsFemaleHead MovementsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeckNeck PainRange of Motion, ArticularReflexReflex, AbnormalReflex, Vestibulo-OcularYoung AdultCervical range of motionCervico-ocular reflexEye stabilization reflexesNeck pain patientsOculomotor disturbancesVestibulo-ocular reflex

Identifiers

PMID29147731
OpenAlexW2769709214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.