Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29147651›Full record

Trial reportBioMed research international2017

Prevalence and Relevance of Pruritus in Pregnancy.

Justyna Szczęch, Artur Wiatrowski, Lidia Hirnle, Adam Reich

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BioMed research international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. European S2k Guideline on Chronic PruritusActa dermato-venereologica · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Pruritus in Pregnancy.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Pruritus in Pregnancy.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2022
    Review
  8. A review of pruritus in pregnancy.Obstetric medicine · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. MRGPRX4 in Cholestatic Pruritus.Seminars in liver disease · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Justyna SzczęchDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Artur Wiatrowski1st Department and Clinic of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Lidia Hirnle2nd Department and Clinic of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Adam ReichDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5573-1754

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pregnant women are at greater risk to suffer from chronic pruritus, but data on this symptom in this group is very limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and the importance of pruritus in pregnant women. A total of 292 consecutive pregnant women at the 33.0 ± 6.1 weeks of gestation (WoG) were recruited into this prospective, cross-sectional study. All patients underwent thorough anamnesis and detailed physical examination with the special emphasis on pruritus. Pruritus was assessed according to Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Quality of life was measured with the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). The point prevalence of pruritus was 20.2% (

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdultFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrevalencePruritus

Identifiers

PMID29147651
PMCPMC5632889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.