Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29147644›Full record

ArticleTranslational cancer research2016

How are lung cancer risk perceptions and cigarette smoking related?-testing an accuracy hypothesis.

Lei-Shih Chen, Kimberly A Kaphingst, Tung-Sung Tseng, Shixi Zhao

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational cancer research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Pancreatic cancer risk to siblings of probands in bilineal cancer settings.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Measuring Cigarette Smoking Risk Perceptions.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lei-Shih ChenDepartment of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Kimberly A KaphingstDepartment of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Tung-Sung TsengDepartment of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Shixi ZhaoDepartment of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Texas A&M University · USHuntsman Cancer Institute · USLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · US

Funding

Communication of Genetic and Genomic Information to Lay AudiencesZ01HG200321 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI KAPHINGST, KIMBERLY A · 2005 to 2008
$1.8M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 HG200321
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSubjective risk perception is an important theoretical construct in the field of cancer prevention and control. Although the relationship between subjective risk perception and health behaviors has been widely studied in many health contexts, the causalities and associations between the risk perception of developing lung cancer and cigarette smoking have been inconsistently reported among studies. Such inconsistency may be from discrepancies between study designs (cross-sectional versus longitudinal designs) and the three hypotheses (i.e., the behavior motivation hypothesis, the risk reappraisals hypothesis, and the accuracy hypothesis) testing different underlying associations between risk perception and cigarette-smoking behaviors. To clarify this issue, as an initial step, we examined the association between absolute and relative risk perceptions of developing lung cancer and cigarette-smoking behaviors among a large, national representative sample of 1,680 U.S. adults by testing an accuracy hypothesis (i.e., people who smoke accurately perceived a higher risk of developing lung cancer).

methodsData from the U.S. Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) were analyzed using logistic regression and multivariate linear regression to examine the associations between risk perception and cigarette-smoking behaviors among 1,680 U.S. adults.

resultsFindings from this cross-sectional survey suggest that absolute and relative risk perceptions were positively and significantly correlated with having smoked >100 cigarettes during lifetime and the frequency of cigarette smoking. Only absolute risk perception was significantly associated with the number of cigarettes smoked per day among current smokers.

conclusionsBecause both absolute and relative risk perceptions are positively related to most cigarette-smoking behaviors, this study supports the accuracy hypothesis. Moreover, absolute risk perception might be a more sensitive measurement than relative risk perception for perceived lung cancer risk. Longitudinal research is needed in the future to investigate other types of risk perception-risk behavior hypotheses-the behavior motivation and the risk reappraisals hypotheses-among nationally representative samples to further examine the causations between risk perception of obtaining lung cancer and smoking behaviors.

Indexed as

accuracy hypothesiscigarette smokingHealth Information National Trends Survey (HINTS)Risk perception

Identifiers

PMID29147644
PMCPMC5685517
OpenAlexW2553400551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.