Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29146863›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2017

Modeling search movements of an insect's front leg.

Tibor I Tóth, Eva Berg, Silvia Daun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A kinematic model of stick-insect walking.Physiological reports · 2019
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tibor I TóthHeisenberg Research Group of Computational Neuroscience - Modeling Neuronal Network Function, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany silvia.daun@uni-koeln.de.
Eva BergKarolinska Institute, University of Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.
Silvia DaunHeisenberg Research Group of Computational Neuroscience - Modeling Neuronal Network Function, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beside locomotion, search movements are another important type of motor activity of insects. They are very often performed by the front legs of the animals. They consist of cyclic stereotypical leg movements that can be modified by sensory signals. The details of the local organization of these movements have however not yet been studied. In this paper, we, using an appropriate variant of our existing one-leg model, present a scheme of how these searching movements might be organized and performed on the level of local neuromuscular control networks. In the simulations with the model, we attempted to mimic the experimental results by Berg et al. (J. Exp. Biol. 216:1064-1074, 2013) in which an obstacle was put in the way of the search movements of the front leg for a very short while, and then the recovery to the usual search movements was observed and analyzed. Our simulation results suggest that the recruitment of the fast levator and depressor muscles play a crucial part in resuming the search movements after removal of the obstacle. The interplay between the levator and depressor, and the extensor and flexor local control networks can, according to the model, bring about a large variety of search movements upon removal of the obstacle. A number of these movements are comparable with those seen in the experiments.

Indexed as

Appetitive BehaviorModels, BiologicalMovementAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaExtremitiesInsectaMuscle, Skeletallocomotionmotor controlneuromuscular modelstick insect

Identifiers

PMID29146863
PMCPMC5704076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.