Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29146572›Full record

ArticleArchives of disease in childhood2018

Cognitive trajectories from infancy to early adulthood following birth before 26 weeks of gestation: a prospective, population-based cohort study.

Louise Linsell, Samantha Johnson, Dieter Wolke, Helen O'Reilly, Joan K Morris, Jennifer J Kurinczuk, Neil Marlow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of disease in childhood, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Social-environmental moderators of neurodevelopmental outcomes in youth born preterm: A systematic review.Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence · 2021
    Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Randomised trial of cord clamping at very preterm birth: outcomes at 2 years.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2020
    Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Developmental outcomes of small infants at a high-risk clinic: A short-term longitudinal study.The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Louise LinsellNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit (NPEU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Samantha JohnsonDepartment of Health Sciences, Centre for Medicine, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Dieter WolkeDepartment of Psychology, Division of Mental Health and Wellbeing, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Helen O'ReillyInstitute of Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.
Joan K MorrisCentre for Environmental and Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Jennifer J KurinczukNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit (NPEU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Neil MarlowInstitute of Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

Department of Health DRF-2012-05-206Medical Research Council G0401525Medical Research Council G1002276Medical Research Council MR/J01107X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the trajectory of cognitive test scores from infancy to adulthood in individuals born extremely preterm compared with term-born individuals.

designA prospective, population-based cohort study.

setting276 maternity units in the UK and Ireland. PATIENTS: 315 surviving infants born less than 26 completed weeks of gestation recruited at birth in 1995 and 160 term-born classroom controls recruited at age 6.

main outcome measuresBayley Scales of Infant Development-Second Edition (age 2.5); Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (ages 6/11); Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence-Second Edition (age 19).

resultsThe mean cognitive scores of extremely preterm individuals over the period were on average 25.2 points below their term-born peers (95% CI -27.8 to -22.6) and remained significantly lower at every assessment. Cognitive trajectories in term-born boys and girls did not differ significantly, but the scores of extremely preterm boys were on average 8.8 points below those of extremely preterm girls (95% CI -13.6 to -4.0). Higher maternal education elevated scores in both groups by 3.2 points (95% CI 0.8 to 5.7). Within the extremely preterm group, moderate/severe neonatal brain injury (mean difference: -10.9, 95% CI -15.5 to -6.3) and gestational age less than 25 weeks (mean difference: -4.4, 95% CI -8.4 to -0.4) also had an adverse impact on cognitive function.

conclusionsThere is no evidence that impaired cognitive function in extremely preterm individuals materially recovers or deteriorates from infancy through to 19 years. Cognitive test scores in infancy and early childhood reflect early adult outcomes.

Indexed as

CognitionHuman DevelopmentAdolescentCase-Control StudiesChildChild, PreschoolCognition DisordersFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantInfant, Extremely PrematureInfant, NewbornInfant, Premature, DiseasesIntelligence TestsMaleepidemiologyneonatologyneurodevelopment

Identifiers

PMID29146572
PMCPMC5890637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.