Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29146223›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Directors Association2018

Delivering Person-Centered Care: Important Preferences for Recipients of Long-term Services and Supports.

Katherine M Abbott, Rachel Klumpp, Kendall A Leser, Jane K Straker, Gerald C Gannod, Kimberly Van Haitsma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Definitions of Person-Centeredness for Persons With Dementia in the United States: A Scoping Review.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Satisfaction With Outdoor Activities Among Northeastern U.S. Newly Enrolled Long-Term Services and Supports Recipients.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Change in Nursing Home Residents' Preferences Over Time.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2018
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katherine M AbbottDepartment of Sociology and Gerontology, Miami University, Oxford, OH. Electronic address: abbottkm@miamioh.edu.
Rachel KlumppDepartment of Sociology and Gerontology, Miami University, Oxford, OH.
Kendall A LeserCollege of Health Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA.
Jane K StrakerScripps Gerontology Center, Miami University, Oxford, OH.
Gerald C GannodDepartment of Computer Science, Tennessee Tech University, Cookeville, TN.
Kimberly Van HaitsmaCollege of Nursing, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. Electronic address: ksv110@psu.edu.

Funding

Assessing preferences for everyday living in the nursing home: reliability and coR21NR011334 · NINR · POLISHER RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI VANHAITSMA, KIMBERLY S · 2011 to 2012
$448k
NINR NIH HHS R21 NR011334
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAlthough assessing individual consumer preferences are an important first step in providing person-centered care, the purpose of this study was to identify the top 10 shared preferences that are important to a majority of consumers receiving long-term services and supports.

designA cross-sectional survey design was used. SETTING AND

participantsPreference assessment interviews were conducted with 255 nursing home (NH) residents and 528 older adults receiving home and community-based services (HCBS). MEASUREMENTS: The Preferences for Everyday Living Inventory (PELI) was used to collect consumer preference information. Two versions of the PELI were used-the PELI-NH for NH residents and the PELI-HC for clients receiving HCBS and analysis focused on 41 shared items between the 2 versions. All respondents answered PELI questions independently and rated the importance of psychosocial preference items on a scale from not at all to a lot/very important.

resultsTen preferences were shared as being important or very important by NH residents and older adults receiving HCBS. Most notably, more than 90% of respondents in each group rated "having regular contact with family" as an important priority. Having privacy, choices about what to eat, when to bathe, and activity options also were important preferences for a majority (77%-93%) in both settings.

conclusionProviders seeking to incorporate preference-based care can utilize study results as a foundation to incorporating important preferences into the care delivery process at the organizational level across care settings. For example, assessing all consumers on this core set of 10 shared preferences can assist with relationship building, transitions in care, and quality improvement. However, preferences with aggregate low-rated levels of importance in this study should not be discredited or eliminated. It is important for providers to understand the unique preference inventory of each older adult, which can then be targeted toward meeting goals for preference fulfillment. This can aid in bringing preferences into practice to improve the quality of care and quality of life to best meet the psychosocial needs of each person.

Indexed as

Long-Term CarePatient PreferenceAgedCommunity Health ServicesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHome Care ServicesHumansMaleNursing HomesPatient-Centered CarePennsylvaniaSurveys and Questionnaireshome- and community-based serviceshome carelong-term services and supportsnursing homesPerson-centered care

Identifiers

PMID29146223
PMCPMC8848294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.