Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29145882›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2017

What Goes Around: the process of building a community-based harm reduction research project.

Chelsea Jalloh, Shohan Illsley, John Wylie, Paula Migliardi, Ethan West, Debbie Stewart, Javier Mignone

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Community Advisory Board Members Speak Out: Insights From an Opioid Overdose Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chelsea JallohThe 595 (Manitoba Harm Reduction Network), Winnipeg, Canada.
Shohan IllsleyThe 595 (Manitoba Harm Reduction Network), Winnipeg, Canada.
John WylieDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Paula MigliardiSexuality Education Resource Centre, Winnipeg, Canada.
Ethan WestThe 595 (Manitoba Harm Reduction Network), Winnipeg, Canada.
Debbie StewartThe 595 (Manitoba Harm Reduction Network), Winnipeg, Canada.
Javier MignoneDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada. Javier.Mignone@umanitoba.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-7248-9341
Manitoba Harm Reduction Network · CAUniversity of Manitoba · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOften, research takes place on underserved populations rather than with underserved populations. This approach can further isolate and stigmatize groups that are already made marginalized. What Goes Around is a community-based research project that was led by community members themselves (Peers). CASE PRESENTATION: This research aimed to implement a community-based research methodology grounded in the leadership and growing research capacity of community researchers and to investigate a topic which community members identified as important and meaningful. Chosen by community members, this project explored how safer sex and safer drug use information is shared informally among Peers. Seventeen community members actively engaged as both community researchers and research participants throughout all facets of the project: inception, implementation, analysis, and dissemination of results. Effective collaboration between community researchers, a community organization, and academics facilitated a research process in which community members actively guided the project from beginning to end.

conclusionsThe methods used in What Goes Around demonstrated that it is not only possible, but advantageous, to draw from community members' involvement and direction in all stages of a community-based research project. This is particularly important when working with a historically underserved population. Purposeful and regular communication among collaborators, ongoing capacity building, and a commitment to respect the experience and expertise of community members were essential to the project's success. This project demonstrated that community members are highly invested in both informally sharing information about safer sex and safer drug use and taking leadership roles in directing research that prioritizes harm reduction in their communities.

Indexed as

Harm ReductionCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchHumansInformation DisseminationLeadershipManitobaProgram EvaluationResearchResearch DesignResearch PersonnelSafe SexSubstance-Related DisordersUniversities

Identifiers

PMID29145882
PMCPMC5689138
OpenAlexW2770123656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.