Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29145868›Full record

Trial reportThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2017

What happened in the 'Move for Well-being in School': a process evaluation of a cluster randomized physical activity intervention using the RE-AIM framework.

Søren Smedegaard, Ruben Brondeel, Lars Breum Christiansen, Thomas Skovgaard

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Søren SmedegaardFIIBL, Research and Innovation Centre for Human Movement and Learning, Odense M, Denmark. ssmedegaard@health.sdu.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-5451-9743
Ruben BrondeelCentre de recherche du CHUM, 900 St Denis St, Montréal, QC, H2X 0A9, Canada.
Lars Breum ChristiansenSDU, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark.
Thomas SkovgaardFIIBL, Research and Innovation Centre for Human Movement and Learning, Odense M, Denmark.

Funding

TrygFonden 2013 Pulje- Nr.24
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to address the gap in the translation of research into practice through an extensive process evaluation of the Move for Well-being in School programme using the RE-AIM framework. The purpose was to gain insight into the extent by which the intervention was adopted and implemented as intended and to understand how educators observed its effectiveness and maintenance.

methodsPublic schools located in seven municipalities in Denmark were invited to enroll their 4th to 6th grade classes in the project. Of these, 24 school decided to participate in the project in the school-year 2015-16 and were randomly (cluster) allocated to either intervention or control group. A process survey was completed online by school personnel at the start, at midterm, and at the end of the school year. Additionally, informal interviews and observations were conducted throughout the year.

resultsAt the 12 intervention schools, a total of 148 educators were involved in the implementation of the programme over the school-year. More than nine out of ten educators integrated brain breaks in their lessons and practically all the physical education teachers used the physical education lesson plans. The educators delivered on average 4.5 brain breaks per week and up to 90% of the physical education teachers used the project lesson plans for at least half of their classes. Half of the educators initiated new recess activities. A total of 78%, 85% and 90% of the educators believed that the implemented recess, brain break and physical education components 'to a high degree' or 'to some degree' promoted the pupils' well-being, respectively.

conclusionsThis study shows that it is possible to design a school-based PA intervention that educators largely adopt and implement. Implementation of the PA elements was stable throughout the school year and data demonstrate that educators believed in the ability of the intervention to promote well-being among the pupils. Finally, the study show that a structured intervention consisting of competence development, set goals for new practices combined with specific materials, and ongoing support, effectively reached a vast majority of all teachers in the enrolled schools with a substantial impact.

trial registrationDate of registration: retrospectively registered on 24 April 2015 at Current Controlled Trials (DOI 0.1186/ ISRCTN12496336 - named: "The role of physical activity in improving the well-being of children and youth").

Indexed as

ExerciseHealth EducationPhysical Education and TrainingSchoolsChildCluster AnalysisDenmarkFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansMaleSchool Health ServicesSocioeconomic FactorsStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesCluster RCTImplementationPhysical activityProcess evaluationRE-AIMSchoolWell-being

Identifiers

PMID29145868
PMCPMC5689205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.