Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29145863›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2017

Assessing quality of maternity care in Hungary: expert validation and testing of the mother-centered prenatal care (MCPC) survey instrument.

Nicholas Rubashkin, Imre Szebik, Petra Baji, Zsuzsa Szántó, Éva Susánszky, Saraswathi Vedam

Abstract readHistorical ArticleValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. 'Global health action · 2024
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Development and Assessment of Respectful Maternity Care Questionnaire in Iran.International journal of community based nursing and midwifery · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicholas RubashkinDepartments of Global Health Sciences and Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California at San Francisco, Mission Hall, Box 1224, 550 16th Street, Third Floor, San Francisco, California, 94158, USA. nicholas.rubashkin@ucsf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6955-0532
Imre SzebikInstitute of Behavioral Sciences, Semmelweis University, VIII. Nagyvárad tér 4. XX. Em, Budapest, H-1089, Hungary.
Petra BajiDepartment of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Fővám tér 8. Main Building Room E113, Budapest, 1093, Hungary.
Zsuzsa SzántóInstitute of Behavioral Sciences, Semmelweis University, VIII. Nagyvárad tér 4. XX. Em, Budapest, H-1089, Hungary.
Éva SusánszkyInstitute of Behavioral Sciences, Semmelweis University, VIII. Nagyvárad tér 4. XX. Em, Budapest, H-1089, Hungary.
Saraswathi VedamThe Birth Place Lab, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInstruments to assess quality of maternity care in Central and Eastern European (CEE) region are scarce, despite reports of poor doctor-patient communication, non-evidence-based care, and informal cash payments. We validated and tested an online questionnaire to study maternity care experiences among Hungarian women.

methodsFollowing literature review, we collated validated items and scales from two previous English-language surveys and adapted them to the Hungarian context. An expert panel assessed items for clarity and relevance on a 4-point ordinal scale. We calculated item-level Content Validation Index (CVI) scores. We designed 9 new items concerning informal cash payments, as well as 7 new "model of care" categories based on mode of payment. The final questionnaire (N = 111 items) was tested in two samples of Hungarian women, representative (N = 600) and convenience (N = 657). We conducted bivariate analysis and thematic analysis of open-ended responses.

resultsExperts rated pre-existing English-language items as clear and relevant to Hungarian women's maternity care experiences with an average CVI for included questions of 0.97. Significant differences emerged across the model of care categories in terms of informal payments, informed consent practices, and women's perceptions of autonomy. Thematic analysis (N = 1015) of women's responses identified 13 priority areas of the maternity care experience, 9 of which were addressed by the questionnaire.

conclusionsWe developed and validated a comprehensive questionnaire that can be used to evaluate respectful maternity care, evidence-based practice, and informal cash payments in CEE region and beyond.

Indexed as

Quality of Health CareAttitude to HealthDelivery of Health CareEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHealth ExpendituresHealth Services ResearchHistory, 16th CenturyHumansHungaryMaternal Health ServicesMothersPregnancyPrenatal CareReproducibility of ResultsSocioeconomic FactorsHungaryInformal paymentsQuestionnaireRespectful maternity careValidation

Identifiers

PMID29145863
PMCPMC5689156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.