Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29145831›Full record

Trial reportBMC pulmonary medicine2017

COPD online-rehabilitation versus conventional COPD rehabilitation - rationale and design for a multicenter randomized controlled trial study protocol (CORe trial).

Henrik Hansen, Theresa Bieler, Nina Beyer, Nina Godtfredsen, Thomas Kallemose, Anne Frølich

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02667171 nacompletednot on this map

COPD Online Rehabilitation (CORe) - a Randomized, Multicenter Telemedicine Intervention Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital Bispebjerg and FrederiksbergRan2016 to 2019Enrolled134ConditionsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveArmsSupervised COPD Rehabilitation (control group), Online COPD rehabilitation (experimental)
NCT05222295 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Supervized Home-Based Pulmonary Telerehabilitation Program and Cognitive Telerehabilitation in Patients With Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorSaglik Bilimleri UniversitesiRan2022 to 2023Enrolled26ConditionsSevere Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Dyspnea, Muscle Weakness, FatigueArmsSupervised Pulmonary Telerehabilitation, Cognitive Telerehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Tele-Rehabilitation Program in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis-A Single-Center Randomized Trial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Henrik HansenResearch Unit for Chronic Diseases and Telemedicine, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2450, Copenhagen, NV, Denmark. Henrik.hansen.09@regionh.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5464-4088
Theresa BielerDepartment of Physical & Occupational Therapy, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nina BeyerInstitute for Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nina GodtfredsenDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Hvidovre University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Thomas KallemoseClinical Research Center, Hvidovre University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Anne FrølichResearch Unit for Chronic Diseases and Telemedicine, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2450, Copenhagen, NV, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKHvidovre Hospital · DK

Funding

Danmarks Lungeforening (DK) F-12910-01-17-01TrygFonden (DK) 111704
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRehabilitation of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a key treatment in COPD. However, despite the existing evidence and a strong recommendation from lung associations worldwide, 50% of patients with COPD decline to participate in COPD rehabilitation program and 30-50% drop-out before completion. The main reasons are severe symptoms, inflexible accessibility and necessity for transportation. Currently there are no well-established and evident rehabilitation alternatives. Supervised online screen rehabilitation could be a useful approach to increase accessibility and compliance. The aim of this multicenter RCT study is to compare the potential benefits of a 10-week online COPD rehabilitation program (CORe) with conventional outpatient COPD rehabilitation (CCRe).

methodsThis study is a randomized assessor- and statistician blinded superiority multicenter trial with two parallel groups, employing 1:1 allocation to the intervention and the comparison group.On the basis of a sample size calculation, 134 patients with severe or very severe COPD and eligible to conventional hospital based outpatient COPD rehabilitation will be included and randomized from eight different hospitals. The CORe intervention group receives group supervised resistance- and endurance training and patient education, 60 min, three times/week for 10 weeks at home via online-screen. The CCRe comparison group receives group based supervised resistance- and endurance training and patient education, 90 min, two times/week for 10 weeks (two hospitals) or 12 weeks (six hospitals) in groups at the local hospital. The primary outcome is change in the 6-min walking distance after 10/12 weeks; the secondary outcomes are changes in 30 s sit-to-stand chair test, physical activity level, symptoms, anxiety and depression symptoms, disease specific and generic quality of life. Primary endpoint is 10/12 weeks from baseline, while secondary endpoints are 22, 36, 62 weeks from baseline assessments. DISCUSSION: The study will likely contribute to knowledge regarding COPD tele-rehabilitation and to which extent it is more feasible and thereby more efficient than conventional COPD rehabilitation in patients with severe and very severe COPD.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02667171 . Registration data: January 28th 2016.

Indexed as

ExerciseResistance TrainingHumansInternetPatient Education as TopicPhysical EndurancePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveQuality of LifeResearch DesignSingle-Blind MethodTelerehabilitationWalk TestCOPDExerciseMulticenterPulmonary rehabilitationQuality of lifeRandomized controlled trialTele-rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID29145831
PMCPMC5689178
OpenAlexW2769397189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.