ArticleBMC bioinformatics2017
ANAT 2.0: reconstructing functional protein subnetworks.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- ANAT 3.0: a framework for elucidating functional protein subnetworks using graph-theoretic and machine learning approaches.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Article
- Introducing the novel Cytoscape app TimeNexus to analyze time-series data using temporal MultiLayer Networks (tMLNs).Scientific reports · 2021Article
- G2G: A web-server for the prediction of human synthetic lethal interactions.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020Article
- ResponseNet v.3: revealing signaling and regulatory pathways connecting your proteins and genes across human tissues.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
- Comparative Analysis of Normalization Methods for Network Propagation.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- Rac1 activation links tau hyperphosphorylation and Aβ dysmetabolism in Alzheimer's disease.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundANAT is a graphical, Cytoscape-based tool for the inference of protein networks that underlie a process of interest. The ANAT tool allows the user to perform network reconstruction under several scenarios in a number of organisms including yeast and human.
resultsHere we report on a new version of the tool, ANAT 2.0, which introduces substantial code and database updates as well as several new network reconstruction algorithms that greatly extend the applicability of the tool to biological data sets.
conclusionsANAT 2.0 is an up-to-date network reconstruction tool that addresses several reconstruction challenges across multiple species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.