Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29145713›Full record

Observational studyArthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)2018

Peter C Grayson, Sara Alehashemi, Armin A Bagheri, Ali Cahid Civelek, Thomas R Cupps, Mariana J Kaplan, Ashkan A Malayeri, Peter A Merkel, Elaine Novakovich, David A Bluemke and 1 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 162 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
162citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
22.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02257866 recruitingnot on this map

Studies of the Natural History, Pathogenesis, and Outcome of Idiopathic Systemic Vasculitis

TypeobservationalSponsorNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)Ran2014 to 2050Enrolled4,000ConditionsTakayasu's Arteritis, Giant Cell Arteritis, Polyarteritis Nodosa, Relapsing Polychondritis
NCT04204876 completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Longitudinal Imaging in Patients With Large Vessel Vasculitis to Predict Further Disease Course

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandRan2020 to 2023Enrolled40ConditionsGiant Cell Arteritis, Large Vessel Giant Cell ArteriitisArmsMagnet Resonance Imaging (MRI), PET/CT analysis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

162 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 330 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Noncerebral Vasculitis.Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2021
    Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Guideline
  6. F-18 FDG PET for assessment of disease activity of large vessel vasculitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Management of Takayasu Arteritis - A 2026 Update.Current rheumatology reports · 2026
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

102 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Peter C GraysonNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-8269-9438
Sara AlehashemiNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Armin A BagheriNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Ali Cahid CivelekRadiology and Imaging Sciences, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Thomas R CuppsGeorgetown University, Washington, DC.
Mariana J KaplanNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Ashkan A MalayeriRadiology and Imaging Sciences, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Peter A MerkelUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Elaine NovakovichNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
David A BluemkeRadiology and Imaging Sciences, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Mark A AhlmanRadiology and Imaging Sciences, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases · USGeorgetown University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Clinical Support Services for the NIAMS Intramural Research ProgramZIDAR041180 · NIAMS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES · PI COLBERT, ROBERT · 2009 to 2025
$119.2M
Systemic AutoimmunityZIAAR041199 · NIAMS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES · PI KAPLAN, MARIANA · 2014 to 2025
$32.5M
Vasculitis and Translational MedicineZIAAR041204 · NIAMS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES · PI GRAYSON, PETER · 2015 to 2025
$15.4M
VCRC-VF FellowshipU54AR057319 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MERKEL, PETER A · 2009 to 2020
$12.5M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 AR999999NIAMS NIH HHS U54 AR057319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the clinical value of

methodsPatients with Takayasu arteritis and giant cell arteritis were studied, along with a comparator group consisting of patients with hyperlipidemia, patients with diseases that mimic LVV, and healthy controls. Participants underwent clinical evaluation and FDG-PET imaging, and patients with LVV underwent serial imaging at 6-month intervals. We calculated sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET interpretation for distinguishing patients with clinically active LVV from comparator subjects and from patients with disease in clinical remission. A qualitative summary score based on global arterial FDG uptake, the PET Vascular Activity Score (PETVAS), was used to study associations between activity on PET scan and clinical characteristics and to predict relapse.

resultsA total of 170 FDG-PET scans were performed in 115 participants (56 patients with LVV and 59 comparator subjects). FDG-PET distinguished patients with clinically active LVV from comparator subjects with a sensitivity of 85% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 69, 94) and a specificity of 83% (95% CI 71, 91). FDG-PET scans were interpreted as active vasculitis in most patients with LVV in clinical remission (41 of 71 [58%]). Clinical disease activity status, disease duration, body mass index, and glucocorticoid use were independently associated with activity on PET scan. Among patients who underwent PET during clinical remission, future clinical relapse was more common in patients with a high PETVAS than in those with a low PETVAS (55% versus 11%; P = 0.03) over a median follow-up period of 15 months.

conclusionFDG-PET provides information about vascular inflammation that is complementary to, and distinct from, clinical assessment in LVV. FDG-PET scan activity during clinical remission was associated with future clinical relapse.

Indexed as

AdultAgedArteriesBiomarkersCohort StudiesFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18Giant Cell ArteritisHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPositron-Emission TomographyProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityTakayasu ArteritisBiomarkersFluorodeoxyglucose F18

Identifiers

PMID29145713
PMCPMC5882488
OpenAlexW2769898966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.