Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29145590›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health (Oxford, England)2018

Who uses foodbanks and why? Exploring the impact of financial strain and adverse life events on food insecurity.

E Prayogo, A Chater, S Chapman, M Barker, N Rahmawati, T Waterfall, G Grimble

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Nutrition Status of People Experiencing Homelessness Residing in Temporary Accommodation in London.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Examining Patterns of Food Bank Use Over Twenty-Five Years in Vancouver, Canada.Voluntas : international journal of voluntary and nonprofit organizations · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

E PrayogoCentre for Behavioural Medicine, Research Department of Practice and Policy, University College London, School of Pharmacy, London, UK.
A ChaterCentre for Behavioural Medicine, Research Department of Practice and Policy, University College London, School of Pharmacy, London, UK.
S ChapmanDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, UK.
M BarkerMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK.
N RahmawatiInstitute for Liver and Digestive Health, University College London, Division of Medicine, London, UK.
T WaterfallInstitute for Liver and Digestive Health, University College London, Division of Medicine, London, UK.
G GrimbleInstitute for Liver and Digestive Health, University College London, Division of Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1017Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/4Medical Research Council MR/N011848/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Rising use of foodbanks highlights food insecurity in the UK. Adverse life events (e.g. unemployment, benefit delays or sanctions) and financial strains are thought to be the drivers of foodbank use. This research aimed to explore who uses foodbanks, and factors associated with increased food insecurity. Methods: We surveyed those seeking help from front line crisis providers from foodbanks (N = 270) and a comparison group from Advice Centres (ACs) (N = 245) in relation to demographics, adverse life events, financial strain and household food security. Results: About 55.9% of foodbank users were women and the majority were in receipt of benefits (64.8%). Benefit delays (31.9%), changes (11.1%) and low income (19.6%) were the most common reasons given for referral. Compared to AC users, there were more foodbank users who were single men without children, unemployed, currently homeless, experiencing more financial strain and adverse life events (P = 0.001). Food insecurity was high in both populations, and more severe if they also reported financial strain and adverse life events. Conclusions: Benefit-related problems appear to be a key reason for foodbank referral. By comparison with other disadvantaged groups, foodbank users experienced more financial strain, adverse life events, both increased the severity of food insecurity.

Indexed as

Financing, PersonalFood AssistanceAdultEducational StatusFemaleFood SupplyHumansMaleMarital StatusPovertyUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID29145590
PMCPMC6186420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.