Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29145549›Full record

ArticleJAMA ophthalmology2017

Generational Differences in the 5-Year Incidence of Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Karen J Cruickshanks, David M Nondahl, Lauren J Johnson, Dayna S Dalton, Mary E Fisher, Guan-Hua Huang, Barbara E Klein, Ronald Klein, Carla R Schubert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Generational Differences in Audiometric and Self-Reported Hearing and Hearing Aid Use.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Potential of Long Non-Coding RNAs in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  6. Age-related macular degeneration.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Epidemiology and Clinical Aspects.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  10. Study the past if you would define the future (Confucius).The British journal of ophthalmology · 2020
    Article
  11. Establishing a three-generation prospective study: Bogalusa daughters.Journal of developmental origins of health and disease · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Karen J CruickshanksDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin–Madison
David M NondahlDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin–Madison
Lauren J JohnsonDepartment of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin–Madison
Dayna S DaltonDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin–Madison
Mary E FisherDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin–Madison
Guan-Hua HuangDepartment of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin–Madison
Barbara E KleinDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin–Madison
Ronald KleinDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin–Madison
Carla R SchubertDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin–Madison

Funding

FAMILIAL AND BIRTH COHORT EFFECTS ON THE AGING SENSESR01AG021917 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CRUICKSHANKS, KAREN J · 2004 to 2018
$25.2M
THE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF AGE-RELATED OCULAR DISEASEU10EY006594 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KLEIN, RONALD · 1987 to 2018
$17.3M
NEI NIH HHS U10 EY006594NIA NIH HHS R01 AG021917
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Whether a reported decline in the risk of developing age-related macular degeneration (AMD) continued for people born during the Baby Boom years (1946-1964) or later is unknown. These data are important to plan for ocular health care needs in the 21st century. Objectives: To determine whether the 5-year risk for AMD declined by generation and to identify factors that contributed to improvement in risk. Design, Setting, and Participants: Data came from the longitudinal cohort Beaver Dam Eye Study (March 1, 1988, through September 15, 1990, and March 1, 1993, through June 15, 1995) and the Beaver Dam Offspring Study (June 8, 2005, through August 4, 2008, and July 12, 2010, through March 21, 2013). These population-based studies examined residents of Beaver Dam, Wisconsin, aged 43 to 84 years in 1987 through 1988 and their adult offspring aged 21 to 84 years in 2005 through 2008. A total of 4819 participants were at risk for developing AMD based on fundus images obtained at baseline visits. Data were analyzed from February 18, 2016, through June 22, 2017, with additional analyses ending September 22, 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: Fundus images were graded for AMD using the Wisconsin Age-related Maculopathy Grading System. The incidence of AMD was defined as the presence at the 5-year follow-up examination of pure geographic atrophy or exudative macular degeneration, any type of drusen with pigmentary abnormalities, or soft indistinct drusen without pigmentary abnormalities. Results: Among the 4819 participants, the mean (SD) baseline age of the cohort was 54 (11) years; 2117 were men (43.9%) and 2702 were women (56.1%). The 5-year age- and sex-adjusted incidence of AMD was 8.8% in the Greatest Generation (born during 1901-1924), 3.0% in the Silent Generation (born during 1925-1945), 1.0% in the Baby Boom Generation (born during 1946-1964), and 0.3% in Generation X (born during 1965-1984). Adjusting for age and sex, each generation was more than 60% less likely to develop AMD than the previous generation (relative risk, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.24-0.46). The generational association (relative risk, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.57) remained significant after adjusting for age, sex, smoking, educational attainment, exercise, levels of non–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, statins, and multivitamins. Conclusions and Relevance: The 5-year risk for AMD declined by birth cohorts throughout the 20th century. Factors that explain this decline in risk are not known. However, this pattern is consistent with reported declines in risks for cardiovascular disease and dementia, suggesting that aging Baby Boomers may experience better retinal health at older ages than did previous generations.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceIntergenerational RelationsMacular DegenerationMaleMiddle AgedPopulation DynamicsRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesWisconsin

Identifiers

PMID29145549
PMCPMC5902189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.