ArticlePloS one2017
Statistical analysis of co-occurrence patterns in microbial presence-absence datasets.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Persistence Vulnerability of the African Savanna ElephantEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- Oral microbiome profiling of primary oral candidiasis during infection and post-antifungal therapy.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Review
- Epidemiological analysis of sexually transmitted infections pathogens and related microorganisms in South Korea: coinfection patterns and pathogen correlations.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Harnessing gastrointestinal microbial co-association networks to predict feed efficiency and methane emissions across beef and dairy cattle.Microbial genomics · 2026Article
- Korean Natural Farming practices are dominated by a limited number of microbes and decrease fungal diversity.Sustainable microbiology · 2026Article
- SHAP-based binarization enhances metataxonomic machine learning with application to gut microbiota of inflammatory bowel disease.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Combining genomics and semen microbiome increases the accuracy of predicting bull prolificacy.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2025Article
- Metabarcoding analysis reveals hidden eukaryotic plankton biodiversity in the Ross Sea, Antarctica.PeerJ · 2025Article
- Host-associated helminth diversity and microbiome composition contribute to anti-pathogen defences in tropical frogs impacted by forest fragmentation.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- A One Health approach based on genomics for enhancing theIJID regions · 2023Article
- Revealing the role of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria in suppressive soils againstHeliyon · 2021Article
- Relationship of DUX4 and target gene expression in FSHD myocytes.Human mutation · 2021Article
- Impairment of Intestinal Barrier Function Induced by Early WeaningFrontiers in immunology · 2021Article
- Next Generation Microbiome Research: Identification of Keystone Species in the Metabolic Regulation of Host-Gut Microbiota Interplay.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- From bag-of-genes to bag-of-genomes: metabolic modelling of communities in the era of metagenome-assembled genomes.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020Review
- Resolution and Cooccurrence Patterns of Gardnerella leopoldii, G. swidsinskii, G. piotii, and G. vaginalis within the Vaginal Microbiome.Infection and immunity · 2019Article
- Detecting interaction networks in the human microbiome with conditional Granger causality.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Microbial network disturbances in relapsing refractory Crohn's disease.Nature medicine · 2019Article
- Application of Machine Learning in Microbiology.Frontiers in microbiology · 2019Review
- Microbiome Multi-Omics Network Analysis: Statistical Considerations, Limitations, and Opportunities.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drawing on a long history in macroecology, correlation analysis of microbiome datasets is becoming a common practice for identifying relationships or shared ecological niches among bacterial taxa. However, many of the statistical issues that plague such analyses in macroscale communities remain unresolved for microbial communities. Here, we discuss problems in the analysis of microbial species correlations based on presence-absence data. We focus on presence-absence data because this information is more readily obtainable from sequencing studies, especially for whole-genome sequencing, where abundance estimation is still in its infancy. First, we show how Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) and Jaccard's index (J)-two of the most common metrics for correlation analysis of presence-absence data-can contradict each other when applied to a typical microbiome dataset. In our dataset, for example, 14% of species-pairs predicted to be significantly correlated by r were not predicted to be significantly correlated using J, while 37.4% of species-pairs predicted to be significantly correlated by J were not predicted to be significantly correlated using r. Mismatch was particularly common among species-pairs with at least one rare species (<10% prevalence), explaining why r and J might differ more strongly in microbiome datasets, where there are large numbers of rare taxa. Indeed 74% of all species-pairs in our study had at least one rare species. Next, we show how Pearson's correlation coefficient can result in artificial inflation of positive taxon relationships and how this is a particular problem for microbiome studies. We then illustrate how Jaccard's index of similarity (J) can yield improvements over Pearson's correlation coefficient. However, the standard null model for Jaccard's index is flawed, and thus introduces its own set of spurious conclusions. We thus identify a better null model based on a hypergeometric distribution, which appropriately corrects for species prevalence. This model is available from recent statistics literature, and can be used for evaluating the significance of any value of an empirically observed Jaccard's index. The resulting simple, yet effective method for handling correlation analysis of microbial presence-absence datasets provides a robust means of testing and finding relationships and/or shared environmental responses among microbial taxa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.