Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29145313›Full record

ArticleMedicine2017

The importance of family caregiving to achieving palliative care at home: a case report of end-of-life breast cancer in an area struck by the 2011 Fukushima nuclear crisis: A case report.

Akihiko Ozaki, Masaharu Tsubokura, Claire Leppold, Toyoaki Sawano, Manabu Tsukada, Tsuyoshi Nemoto, Kazuhiro Kosugi, Yoshitaka Nishikawa, Shigeaki Kato, Hiromichi Ohira

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Akihiko OzakiaDepartment of Surgery, Minamisoma Municipal General Hospital, Minamisoma, Fukushima, Japan bTeikyo University Graduate School of Public Health, Tokyo, Japan cDepartment of Internal Medicine, Soma Central Hospital, Soma, Fukushima, Japan dGlobal Public Health Unit, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK eDepartment of Research, Minamisoma Municipal General Hospital, Minamisoma, Fukushima, Japan fDepartment of Home Medical Care, Minamisoma Municipal General Hospital, Minamisoma, Fukushima, Japan gDepartment of Palliative Care, Kawasaki Municipal Ida Hospital, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan hDepartment of Health Informatics, School of Public Health, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan iResearch Institute of Innovative Medicine (RIIM), Tokiwa Foundation, Iwaki, Fukushima, Japan.
Masaharu Tsubokura
Claire Leppold
Toyoaki Sawano
Manabu Tsukada
Tsuyoshi Nemoto
Kazuhiro Kosugi
Yoshitaka Nishikawa
Shigeaki Kato
Hiromichi Ohira
Imakiire General Hospital · JPSoma Central Hospital · JPKawasaki Municipal Hospital · JPUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleThe primary setting of palliative care has shifted from inpatient care to patients' residences. Family caregiving is essential for patients with life-limiting illnesses to receive palliative care at home, however little information is available regarding potential interventions to achieve palliative homecare for those without sufficient support from family members in various settings, including disasters. PATIENT CONCERNS: In March 2011, Fukushima, Japan experienced an earthquake, tsunami and nuclear disaster. In August 2015, a 59-year-old Japanese female presented to our hospital, located 23 km north of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant, with a right breast ulcer. DIAGNOSES: The patient was diagnosed with stage IV breast cancer.

interventionsThe patient's general condition gradually worsened despite a one-year course of chemotherapy, and she became bedridden after a fall in October 2016. Although the patient wished to receive palliative homecare, this appeared challenging to achieve because she resided alone in a temporary housing shelter. Although she originally lived with her family in Odaka District, Fukushima, she relocated outside of the city following evacuation orders after the disaster. The evacuation orders for Odaka District were still in effect when she returned to the city alone in 2014. We contacted her sister who moved apart from her during the evacuation, and explained the necessity of family caregiving to enable her palliative homecare. OUTCOMES: The sister decided to move back to their original residence in Odaka District and live with the patient again. The patient successfully spent her end-of-life period and died at home. LESSONS: Health care providers and community health workers may need to take a pro-active approach to communicating with family members to draw informal support to enable patients' end-of-life management according to their values and preferences. This is a lesson which may be applicable to broader healthcare settings beyond cancer, or disaster contexts, considering that population ageing and social isolation may continue to advance worldwide.

Indexed as

CaregiversHome Care ServicesPalliative CareTerminal CareBreast NeoplasmsFemaleFukushima Nuclear AccidentHumansJapanMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID29145313
PMCPMC5704858
OpenAlexW2769587223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.