Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29144973›Full record

ReviewNeuron2017

Orbitofrontal Cortex: A Neural Circuit for Economic Decisions.

Camillo Padoa-Schioppa, Katherine E Conen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuron, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 146 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
146citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

146 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Neuronal Activity in Orbitofrontal Cortex during Trinary Choices under Risk.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

86 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Camillo Padoa-SchioppaDepartment of Neuroscience, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; Department of Economics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA. Electronic address: camillo@wustl.edu.
Katherine E ConenDepartment of Neuroscience, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.

Funding

Systems and Molecular Neurobiology Training ProgramT32GM008151 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SNYDER, LAWRENCE H · 1985 to 2019
$6.5M
THE ROLE OF PREFRONTAL REGIONS IN ECONOMIC CHOICE AND CHOICE-GUIDED BEHAVIORR01DA032758 · NIDA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Camillo Padoa-Schioppa · 2012 to 2026
$5.4M
NEURONAL MECHANISMS OF GOOD-BASED ECONOMIC DECISIONSR01MH104494 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI PADOA-SCHIOPPA, CAMILLO · 2015 to 2025
$4.2M
A MOUSE MODEL OF ECONOMIC DECISIONS.R21DA042882 · NIDA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI PADOA-SCHIOPPA, CAMILLO · 2017 to 2018
$419k
Analyzing contextual adaptation in value-encoding neurons during economic choice.F31MH107111 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CONEN, KATHERINE E · 2015 to 2016
$60k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA032758NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA042882NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008151NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH107111NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH104494
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Economic choice behavior entails the computation and comparison of subjective values. A central contribution of neuroeconomics has been to show that subjective values are represented explicitly at the neuronal level. With this result at hand, the field has increasingly focused on the difficult question of where in the brain and how exactly subjective values are compared to make a decision. Here, we review a broad range of experimental and theoretical results suggesting that good-based decisions are generated in a neural circuit within the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). The main lines of evidence supporting this proposal include the fact that goal-directed behavior is specifically disrupted by OFC lesions, the fact that different groups of neurons in this area encode the input and the output of the decision process, the fact that activity fluctuations in each of these cell groups correlate with choice variability, and the fact that these groups of neurons are computationally sufficient to generate decisions. Results from other brain regions are consistent with the idea that good-based decisions take place in OFC and indicate that value signals inform a variety of mental functions. We also contrast the present proposal with other leading models for the neural mechanisms of economic decisions. Finally, we indicate open questions and suggest possible directions for future research.

Indexed as

AnimalsChoice BehaviorDecision MakingHumansModels, NeurologicalNeurosciencesPrefrontal Cortexattentional drift-diffusion modeldecision neurosciencedistributed-consensus modeleconomic choicegoal-directed behaviorgood-based modelneuroeconomicsprefrontal cortexsubjective valuevalue-based decision

Identifiers

PMID29144973
PMCPMC5726577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.