ReviewAnnual review of animal biosciences2018
Equine Intestinal Mucosal Pathobiology.
Review in Annual review of animal biosciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surgical removal of a cecal enterolith in a Rock Hyrax (Procavia capensis).The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2026Article
- Influence of Cryptosporidium parvum and Giardia duodenalis on glucose transport mechanisms and tight junctions in co-infected enterocytes.Parasites & vectors · 2026Article
- A Review of Epithelial Ion Transporters and Their Roles in Equine Infectious Colitis.Veterinary sciences · 2024Review
- A matter of differentiation: equine enteroids as a model for the in vivo intestinal epithelium.Veterinary research · 2024Article
- Assessment of equine intestinal epithelial junctional complexes and barrier permeability using a monolayer culture system.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- Mechanisms and modeling of wound repair in the intestinal epithelium.Tissue barriers · 2023Review
- Gut health of horses: effects of high fibre vs high starch diet on histological and morphometrical parameters.BMC veterinary research · 2022Article
- Comparative Analysis of Microbiome Metagenomics in Reintroduced Wild Horses and Resident Asiatic Wild Asses in the Gobi Desert Steppe.Microorganisms · 2022Article
- Adaptive mechanisms in no flow vs. low flow ischemia in equine jejunum epithelium: Different paths to the same destination.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
- Fecal Secretory Immunoglobulin A and Lactate Level as a Biomarker of Mucosal Immune Dysfunction in Horses With Colic.Journal of veterinary internal medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The equine intestinal mucosa is intimately involved in maintaining homeostasis both on a systemic level by controlling extracellular fluid movement and at the local level to maintain barrier function. Horses are particularly susceptible to the clinical syndrome of colic, with the most severe cases involving strangulating obstruction that induces ischemia. Because of the mucosal vascular architecture, the mucosal epithelium is particularly susceptible to ischemic injury. The potential for reperfusion injury has been investigated and found to play a minimal role. However, inflammation does affect mucosal repair. Mechanisms of repair, including villus contraction, epithelial restitution, and tight junction closure, are critical to reforming the mucosal barrier. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have an impact on this repair, particularly at the level of the tight junctions. Completion of mucosal regeneration requires proliferation, which is now being actively studied in equine enteroids. All of these aspects of equine mucosal pathobiology are reviewed in depth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.