ArticleNature2017
Erratum: Non-homeostatic body weight regulation through a brainstem-restricted receptor for GDF15.
Article in Nature, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cancer cachexia: molecular basis and therapeutic advances.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- DAMPs cross-talk interpretation of MDD mechanisms.Science advances · 2025Review
- Increased Growth Differentiation Factor 15 Levels Are Associated with HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Impairment: A Pilot Study.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Growth differentiation factor-15 in patients with or at risk of heart failure but before first hospitalisation.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2024Article
- Sensory Circumventricular Organs, Neuroendocrine Control, and Metabolic Regulation.Metabolites · 2021Review
- Activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis by exogenous and endogenous GDF15.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Post-Translational Modifications of Deubiquitinating Enzymes: Expanding the Ubiquitin Code.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
34 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This corrects the article DOI: 10.1038/nature24042.
Identifiers
29144449What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.