Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29143861›Full record

ReviewNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2018

Migraine with prolonged aura: phenotype and treatment.

Michele Viana, Shazia Afridi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Changes of migraine aura with advancing age of patients.The journal of headache and pain · 2023
    Article
  4. Maculopathy Masquerading as Migraine.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  5. Pediatric Episodic Migraine with Aura: A Unique Entity?Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Michele VianaHeadache Science Center, C. Mondino National Neurological Institute, Via Mondino 2, 27100, Pavia, Italy. michele.viana@ymail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4356-8109
Shazia AfridiDepartment of Neurology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, UK.
Fondazione Istituto Neurologico Nazionale Casimiro Mondino · ITGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Italian Ministry of Health RC 2013-2015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We review the published literature on migraine with prolonged aura (PA), specifically with regards to the phenotype and treatment options. PA is not uncommon. A recent study found that about 17% of migraine auras are prolonged and that 26% of patients with migraine with aura have experienced at least one PA. The characteristics of PA are similar to most typical auras with the exception of a higher number of aura symptoms (in particular sensory and/or dysphasic). There are no well-established treatments at present which target the aura component of migraine. Other than case reports, there have been open-label studies of lamotrigine and greater occipital nerve blocks. The only randomised, blinded, controlled trial to date has been of nasal ketamine showing some reduction in aura severity but not duration. A small open-labelled pilot study of amiloride was also promising. Larger randomised, controlled trials are needed to establish whether any of the existing or novel compounds mentioned are significantly effective and safe.

Indexed as

PhenotypeHumansKetamineLamotrigineMigraine with AuraPilot ProjectsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeTriazinesTryptaminesKetamineLamotrigineTriazinesTryptaminesDurationMigraine with auraNon-hemiplegic migraine auraPhenotypeProlonged

Identifiers

PMID29143861
OpenAlexW2770673966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.