Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29143643›Full record

ReviewParasites & vectors2017

Subcutaneous dirofilariosis (Dirofilaria repens): an infection spreading throughout the old world.

Claudio Genchi, Laura Kramer

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Parasites & vectors, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 147 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Geographical Distribution and Molecular Characterization ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  6. Epidemiological and Molecular Investigation ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  7. International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2026
    Article
  8. Rapid Point-of-Care Detection ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  9. Infectious disease reports · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. First molecular characterization ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Nasolabial dirofilariasis in humans: a case report.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2025
    Article
  15. Circulation ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Genetic characterization of zoonoticMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Claudio GenchiDipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133, Milan, Italy. claudio.genchi@unimi.it.
Laura KramerDipartimento di Scienze Medico Veterinarie, Università di Parma, Parma, Italy.
University of Milan · ITUniversity of Parma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTwo main Dirofilaria species infect dogs: D. immitis and D. repens. While D. immitis has a worldwide distribution, D. repens is currently found only in Europe, Asia, and Africa. Adult D. repens are located in subcutaneous tissues of natural hosts where they survive for long periods of time. First-stage larvae, microfilariae, circulate in the peripheral bloodstream, where they are taken up by the mosquito intermediate hosts. Infected mosquitoes then transmit infective third-stage (L3) larvae to new hosts through the blood meal. In dogs, most infections are asymptomatic, although cutaneous disorders such as pruritus, dermal swelling, subcutaneous nodules, and ocular conjunctivitis can be observed. Currently, two factors have increased the concerns about this parasitic infection 1) its spread throughout the European countries and to other continents and its prevalence in dog populations, where in some cases it has overcome D. immitis; and 2) its zoonotic potential, which is much greater than that of D. immitis.

resultsDifferent hypotheses can be put forward to explain these concerns. First, climate change has allowed more favorable conditions for survival of culicid vectors. Second, accidental hosts such as humans may have a less efficient immune reaction against a parasite that is located in subcutaneous tissues, and thus less exposed to the host's immune response than, for instance, D. immitis. Furthermore, the absence of clinical signs in the majority of canine infections and the difficulty in diagnosing the infection, due to the lack of serologic tests and thus the reliance on the identification of microfilariae and differentiation from D. immitis to confirm the presence of the parasite, favor the further spread of this species. Finally, among the macrocyclic lactones currently used to prevent heartworm infection, only moxidectin has been found to be fully effective against the infective larvae transmitted by mosquitoes and partially effective (efficacy 96%) against adult D. repens in experimental studies.

conclusionsDirofilaria repens infection is much more difficult than D. immitis to diagnose and control in the reservoir population (microfilaremic dogs). In addition, lack of familiarity with D. repens infection could lead to lack of vigilance underestimation for this parasite. The number of human cases in Europe and Asia is currently a serious public health concern. Medical doctors and veterinarians must collaborate closely for better control and surveillance of D. repens infection.

Indexed as

AfricaAnimalsAsiaDirofilaria repensDirofilariasisDog DiseasesDogsEuropeHumansSubcutaneous TissueDirofilaria repensSubcutaneous dirofilariosisZoonosis

Identifiers

PMID29143643
PMCPMC5688444
OpenAlexW2767740195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.