Trial reportBMC pregnancy and childbirth2017
Randomized controlled pilot of a group antenatal care model and the sociodemographic factors associated with pregnancy-related empowerment in sub-Saharan Africa.
Trial report in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of group antenatal care on maternal health continuum of care and perinatal outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ global health · 2026Pooled it
- Assessment tools measuring health-related empowerment in psychosocially vulnerable populations: a systematic review.International journal for equity in health · 2021Pooled it
- A systematic review of providers' experiences of facilitating group antenatal care.Reproductive health · 2021Pooled it
- Group antenatal care positively transforms the care experience: Results of an effectiveness trial in Malawi.PloS one · 2025Trial
- The impact of group antenatal care on newborns: Results of a cluster randomized control trial in Eastern Region, Ghana.BMC pediatrics · 2024Trial
- Trial
- Impact of group prenatal care on key prenatal services and educational topics in Malawi and Tanzania.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2021Trial
- Assessing the impact of group antenatal care on gestational length in Rwanda: A cluster-randomized trial.PloS one · 2021Trial
- An effectiveness-implementation hybrid type 1 trial assessing the impact of group versus individual antenatal care on maternal and infant outcomes in Malawi.BMC public health · 2020Trial
- Effects of customer self-audit on the quality of maternity care in Tabriz: A cluster-randomized controlled trial.PloS one · 2018Trial
- Implementation challenges and outcomes of a randomized controlled pilot study of a group prenatal care model in Malawi and Tanzania.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2017Trial
- Introducing a group antenatal care model at the health post level in Ethiopia: a qualitative pilot study.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2026Article
- Provider Perspectives on Group PrEP Care for Sex Workers: A Pre-implementation Study in a U.S. Midwestern Community Health Center.Archives of sexual behavior · 2026Article
- "Each moon we come to weigh the pregnancy:" Exploring the experience of group antenatal care processes in Benin and their contributions to self-efficacy.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Innovation in prenatal care: a global review of implementing group prenatal care and impacts on women, children, and health care providers.Frontiers in global women's health · 2026Review
- Exploring the acceptability and impact of group antenatal care: a qualitative study among women in selected health facilities in Burkina Faso.Reproductive health · 2025Article
- Women's experiences of communication and supportive care during labour: a qualitative study in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Exploring Empowerment in Group Antenatal Care: Insights from an Insider and Outsider Perspective.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Integrated group antenatal and pediatric care in Haiti: A comprehensive care accompaniment model.PloS one · 2024Article
- Quality intrapartum care expectations and experiences of women in sub-Saharan African Low and Low Middle-Income Countries: a qualitative meta-synthesis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe links between empowerment and a number of health-related outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa have been documented, but empowerment related to pregnancy is under-investigated. Antenatal care (ANC) is the entry point into the healthcare system for most women, so it is important to understand how ANC affects aspects of women's sense of control over their pregnancy. We compare pregnancy-related empowerment for women randomly assigned to the standard of care versus CenteringPregnancy-based group ANC (intervention) in two sub-Saharan countries, Malawi and Tanzania.
methodsPregnant women in Malawi (n = 112) and Tanzania (n = 110) were recruited into a pilot study and randomized to individual ANC or group ANC. Retention at late pregnancy was 81% in Malawi and 95% in Tanzania. In both countries, individual ANC, termed focused antenatal care (FANC), is the standard of care. FANC recommends four ANC visits plus a 6-week post-birth visit and is implemented following the country's standard of care. In group ANC, each contact included self- and midwife-assessments in group space and 90 minutes of interactive health promotion. The number of contacts was the same for both study conditions. We measured pregnancy-related empowerment in late pregnancy using the Pregnancy-Related Empowerment Scale (PRES). Independent samples t-tests and multiple linear regressions were employed to assess whether group ANC led to higher PRES scores than individual ANC and to investigate other sociodemographic factors related to pregnancy-related empowerment.
resultsIn Malawi, women in group ANC had higher PRES scores than those in individual ANC. Type of care was a significant predictor of PRES and explained 67% of the variation. This was not so in Tanzania; PRES scores were similar for both types of care. Predictive models including sociodemographic variables showed religion as a potential moderator of treatment effect in Tanzania. Muslim women in group ANC had a higher mean PRES score than those in individual ANC; a difference not observed among Christian women.
conclusionsGroup ANC empowers pregnant women in some contexts. More research is needed to identify the ways that models of ANC can affect pregnancy-related empowerment in addition to perinatal outcomes globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.