ArticlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2018
An algorithm to detect unexpected increases in frequency of reports of adverse events in EudraVigilance.
Article in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimising Pharmacovigilance Efficiency with MLIT (Machine Learning for Intelligent Triage): A Tool for Statistical Safety Alerts.Drug safety · 2026Article
- Advancing drug safety science by integrating molecular knowledge with post-marketing adverse event reports.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2022Review
- Increased emergency cardiovascular events among under-40 population in Israel during vaccine rollout and third COVID-19 wave.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Monitoring the manufacturing and quality of medicines: a fundamental task of pharmacovigilance.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2021Review
- Use of Social Media for Pharmacovigilance Activities: Key Findings and Recommendations from the Vigi4Med Project.Drug safety · 2020Article
- Improving the Safety of Medicines in the European Union: From Signals to Action.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2020Review
- An algorithm to detect unexpected increases in frequency of reports of adverse events in EudraVigilance.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe European Medicines Agency developed an algorithm to detect unexpected increases in frequency of reports, to enhance the ability to detect adverse events that manifest as increases in frequency, in particular quality defects, medication errors, and cases of abuse or misuse.
methodsAn algorithm based on a negative binomial time-series regression model run on 6 sequential observations prior to the monitored period was developed to forecast monthly counts of reports. A heuristic model to capture increases in counts when the previous 4 observations were null supplemented the regression. Count data were determined at drug-event combination. Sensitivity analyses were run to determine the effect of different methods of pooling or stratifying count data. Positive retrospective detections and positive predictive values (PPVs) were determined.
resultsThe algorithm detected 8 of the 13 historical concerns, including all concerns of quality defects. The highest PPV (1.29%) resulted from increasing the lower count threshold from 3 to 5 and including literature reports in the counts. Both the regression model and the heuristic model components to the algorithm contributed to the detection of concerns. Sensitivity analysis indicates that stratification by commercial product reduces the PPV but suggests that pooling counts of related events may improve it.
conclusionThe results are encouraging and suggest that the algorithm could be useful for the detection of concerns that manifest as changes in frequency of reporting; however, further testing, including in prospective use, is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.