Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29143299›Full record

ArticlePlant molecular biology2018

A comparative transcriptomic approach to understanding the formation of cork.

Pau Boher, Marçal Soler, Anna Sánchez, Claire Hoede, Céline Noirot, Jorge Almiro Pinto Paiva, Olga Serra, Mercè Figueras

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Plant molecular biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Cork Development: What Lies Within.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  4. Multiomics Molecular Research into the Recalcitrant and OrphanInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  5. Potato Periderm Development and Tuber Skin Quality.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. CorkOakDB-The Cork Oak Genome Database Portal.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Pau BoherLaboratori del Suro, Faculty of Science, Biology Department, Universitat de Girona, C/ Maria Aurèlia Campmany 40, 17003, Girona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1558-0779
Marçal SolerLaboratori del Suro, Faculty of Science, Biology Department, Universitat de Girona, C/ Maria Aurèlia Campmany 40, 17003, Girona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9138-9394
Anna SánchezLaboratori del Suro, Faculty of Science, Biology Department, Universitat de Girona, C/ Maria Aurèlia Campmany 40, 17003, Girona, Spain.
Claire HoedePF Bioinfo GenoToul, MIAT, Université de Toulouse, INRA, 24 Chemin de Borde Rouge, 31320, Auzeville-Tolosane, France.
Céline NoirotPF Bioinfo GenoToul, MIAT, Université de Toulouse, INRA, 24 Chemin de Borde Rouge, 31320, Auzeville-Tolosane, France.
Jorge Almiro Pinto PaivaiBET, Instituto de Biologia Experimental e Tecnológica, Avenida da República, Estação Agronómica Nacional, 2780-157, Oeiras, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3162-4396
Olga SerraLaboratori del Suro, Faculty of Science, Biology Department, Universitat de Girona, C/ Maria Aurèlia Campmany 40, 17003, Girona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1678-0932
Mercè FiguerasLaboratori del Suro, Faculty of Science, Biology Department, Universitat de Girona, C/ Maria Aurèlia Campmany 40, 17003, Girona, Spain. merce.figueras@udg.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6288-1830
Universitat de Girona · ESUniversité Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées · FRInstitute of Plant Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences · PL

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación AGL2009-13745Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación FPI grantPolish ministry W26/7.PR/2015Secretaría de Estado de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación AGL2012-36725Secretaría de Estado de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación AGL2015-67495-C2-1-RSeventh Framework Programme 621321
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageThe transcriptome comparison of two oak species reveals possible candidates accounting for the exceptionally thick and pure cork oak phellem, such as those involved in secondary metabolism and phellogen activity. Cork oak, Quercus suber, differs from other Mediterranean oaks such as holm oak (Quercus ilex) by the thickness and organization of the external bark. While holm oak outer bark contains sequential periderms interspersed with dead secondary phloem (rhytidome), the cork oak outer bark only contains thick layers of phellem (cork rings) that accumulate until reaching a thickness that allows industrial uses. Here we compare the cork oak outer bark transcriptome with that of holm oak. Both transcriptomes present similitudes in their complexity, but whereas cork oak external bark is enriched with upregulated genes related to suberin, which is the main polymer responsible for the protective function of periderm, the upregulated categories of holm oak are enriched in abiotic stress and chromatin assembly. Concomitantly with the upregulation of suberin-related genes, there is also induction of regulatory and meristematic genes, whose predicted activities agree with the increased number of phellem layers found in the cork oak sample. Further transcript profiling among different cork oak tissues and conditions suggests that cork and wood share many regulatory mechanisms, probably reflecting similar ontogeny. Moreover, the analysis of transcripts accumulation during the cork growth season showed that most regulatory genes are upregulated early in the season when the cork cambium becomes active. Altogether our work provides the first transcriptome comparison between cork oak and holm oak outer bark, which unveils new regulatory candidate genes of phellem development.

Indexed as

QuercusTranscriptomeWoodCorkCork oakPhellemRhytidomeSuberinWax

Identifiers

PMID29143299
OpenAlexW2769270168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.