ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2018
Long-term impact of temozolomide on 1p/19q-codeleted low-grade glioma growth kinetics.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- The use of minor response, volumetric assessment, and growth rate kinetics as endpoints in grade 1-3 glioma clinical trials: a RANO perspective.Neuro-oncology · 2025Review
- The role of vorasidenib in the treatment of isocitrate dehydrogenase-mutant glioma.Neuro-oncology · 2025Review
- Screening and Identification of Key Biomarkers in Lower Grade Glioma via Bioinformatical Analysis.Applied bionics and biomechanics · 2022Article
- Article
- Review
- Recent developments and future directions in adult lower-grade gliomas: Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) and European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) consensus.Neuro-oncology · 2019Review
- Evidence-Based Practice: Temozolomide Beyond Glioblastoma.Current oncology reports · 2019Review
- Therapeutic Interventions in Adult Low-Grade Gliomas.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2019Review
- Neuro-Oncology Clinical Debate: PCV or temozolomide in combination with radiation for newly diagnosed high-grade oligodendroglioma.Neuro-oncology practice · 2019Review
- Article
- Imaging practice in low-grade gliomas among European specialized centers and proposal for a minimum core of imaging.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2018Article
- Longitudinal assessment of quality of life, neurocognition, and psychopathology in patients with low-grade glioma on first-line temozolomide: A feasibility study.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
- Modeling tumor volume trajectory and outcome identifies 3 distinct response classes in lower-grade IDH-mutant glioma receiving first-line chemotherapy.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although upfront temozolomide (TMZ) has been widely-used to treat 1p/19q-codeleted diffuse low-grade gliomas (LGG), its long-term impact on the growth kinetics of these tumors has not been determined. Based on serial magnetic resonance images we retrospectively evaluated the evolution of the mean tumor diameter (MTD) in 36 progressive 1p/19q-codeleted LGG treated with upfront TMZ. After TMZ onset, all but two patients (94.4%) presented a progressive MTD decrease that lasted for a median duration of 23 months (range 3-114). In 10 patients (27%) MTD regrowth occurred during TMZ treatment and in 22 patients (66%) after TMZ discontinuation. In these patients, median time to MTD regrowth after TMZ discontinuation was 12 months (range 1-88). The rate of MTD regrowth at 3 and 5 years after TMZ onset was 77 and 94%, respectively. Time to tumor progression (TTP) based on volumetric analysis was shorter than TTP based on Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) bidimensional criteria (23 vs. 35 months, p = 0.05) and shorter than time to next oncological treatment (23 vs. 46 months, p = 0.001). In 10 patients (27%), absence of volumetric analysis led to continue TMZ for a median of 10 cycles after MTD had started to regrow. Volumetric analysis is important to precisely assess chemotherapy efficacy in 1p/19q-codeleted LGG, identify early tumor progression and avoid futile chemotherapy continuation. In the present series, although some long-lasting volumetric responses were observed, most tumors resumed their growth within 3 years after TMZ onset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.