ArticleImmunologic research2018
Using circulating tumor cells to evaluate the efficacy of irreversible electroporation for unresectasble pancreatic cancer.
Article in Immunologic research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Long-term response of metastatic renal clear cell carcinoma following a subcutaneous injection of mixed bacterial vaccine: a case report.OncoTargets and therapy · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We used circulating tumor cells (CTCs) as biomarkers to evaluate the efficacy of pre-irreversible electroporation (IRE) and post-IRE for unresectable pancreatic cancer (PC). Real-time qPCR was used to detect potential biomarker genes in CTCs, and magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) were performed on 43 patients with PC who underwent IRE. Some patients experienced adverse reactions within 30 days of the operation, including arrhythmia (6.9%), intraoperative transient change of blood pressure (25.5%), cough (11.6%), nausea and vomiting (23.3%), ascites (25.6%), fever (9.3%), and pain of puncture point (60.5%). The number of CTCs decreased significantly with postoperative time (P < 0.01). Delta cycle threshold values for the CTC-related genes CEA, Ep-CAM, and CK19 increased significantly after IRE. Furthermore, the expression of CEA, Ep-CAM, and CK19 decreased significantly with time after IRE (P < 0.01). Detecting CTCs by RT-qPCR and FACS combined with MACS has significant diagnostic and prognostic value for evaluating the efficacy of IRE in patients with unresectable PC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29143247What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.