ArticleAMB Express2017
Controlling Streptococcus mutans and Staphylococcus aureus biofilms with direct current and chlorhexidine.
Article in AMB Express, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring Anti-Biofilm Mechanisms of Spilanthes paniculata Essential Oil Against Oral Pathogens: An In Vitro and In Silico Study.Chemistry & biodiversity · 2026Article
- Smart biomaterials in restorative dentistry: Recent advances and future perspectives.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Article
- Article
- Revealing detrimental effects of various DC electrical energy conditions on different multidrug resistant bacteria: a comprehensive study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Enhanced Antibacterial Properties of Titanium Surfaces through Diversified Ion Plating with Silver Atom Deposition.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Article
- Zirconia Dental Implants Surface Electric Stimulation Impact onInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Suppression ofIranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2024Article
- Smart dental materials for antimicrobial applications.Bioactive materials · 2023Article
- Article
- Investigation of the Antibacterial, Anti-Biofilm, and Antioxidative Effect ofMicroorganisms · 2022Article
- Effect of pH-sensitive nanoparticles on inhibiting oral biofilms.Drug delivery · 2022Article
- Preliminary Novel Analysis on Antimicrobial Properties of Concentrated Growth Factor against Bacteria-Induced Oral Diseases.European journal of dentistry · 2022Article
- Prevalence of Methicillin and β-Lactamase Resistant Pathogens Associated with Oral and Periodontal Disease of Children in Mymensingh, Bangladesh.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Formulation, characteristics and anti-bacterial effects ofJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2022Article
- Upregulation of Toll-like Receptor 2 in Dental Primary Afferents Following Pulp Injury.Experimental neurobiology · 2021Article
- Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Effect of Thymoquinone against Different Dental Pathogens: An In Vitro Study.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Effect of Low Amperage Electric Current on Staphylococcus Aureus-Strategy for Combating Bacterial Biofilms Formation on Dental Implants in Cystic Fibrosis Patients, In Vitro Study.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Thermal Shock and Ciprofloxacin Act Orthogonally onAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Beneficial Role of Antioxidant Secondary Metabolites from Medicinal Plants in Maintaining Oral Health.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Microbial biofilms formed on biomaterials are major causes of chronic infections. Among them, Gram-positive bacteria Streptococcus mutans and Staphylococcus aureus are important pathogens causing infections associated with dental caries (tooth-decay) and other medical implants. Unfortunately, current antimicrobial approaches are ineffective in disrupting established biofilms and new methods are needed to improve the efficacy. In this study, we report that the biofilm cells of S. mutans and S. aureus can be effectively killed by low-level direct current (DC) and through synergy in concurrent treatment with DC and chlorhexidine (CHX) at low concentrations. For example, after treatment with 28 µA/cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.