Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29143103›Full record

Observational studyHeart and vessels2018

Combined assessment of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and ejection fraction by left ventriculography predicts long-term outcomes of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Daiga Saito, Rine Nakanishi, Ippei Watanabe, Takayuki Yabe, Ryo Okubo, Hideo Amano, Mikihito Toda, Takanori Ikeda

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Heart and vessels, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Impact of Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Pressure on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Daiga SaitoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Toho University Graduate School of Medicine, 6-11-1 Omorinishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 143-8541, Japan.
Rine NakanishiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Toho University Graduate School of Medicine, 6-11-1 Omorinishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 143-8541, Japan. rine.n@med.toho-u.ac.jp.
Ippei WatanabeDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Toho University Graduate School of Medicine, 6-11-1 Omorinishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 143-8541, Japan.
Takayuki YabeDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Toho University Graduate School of Medicine, 6-11-1 Omorinishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 143-8541, Japan.
Ryo OkuboDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Toho University Graduate School of Medicine, 6-11-1 Omorinishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 143-8541, Japan.
Hideo AmanoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Toho University Graduate School of Medicine, 6-11-1 Omorinishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 143-8541, Japan.
Mikihito TodaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Toho University Graduate School of Medicine, 6-11-1 Omorinishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 143-8541, Japan.
Takanori IkedaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Toho University Graduate School of Medicine, 6-11-1 Omorinishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 143-8541, Japan.

Funding

Grants-in-Aid 15K09103Grants-in-Aid 16K01433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), it is unclear if combined assessment of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improves prediction of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). We analyzed data from 266 STEMI patients who underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention and subsequent left ventriculography (LVG). Patients were divided into 4 groups, as follows: Group 1, LVEDP < 21 mmHg and LVEF ≥ 55%; Group 2, LVEDP < 21 mmHg and LVEF < 55%; Group 3, LVEDP ≥ 21 mmHg and LVEF ≥ 55%; and Group 4, LVEDP ≥ 21 mmHg and LVEF < 55%. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to determine if LVEDP and LVEF were associated with MACE (including cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and heart failure requiring hospitalization). Change in LV parameters was assessed in the subset of 183 patients who underwent serial LVG (mean interval 6.3 ± 1.6 months). During a mean follow-up of 43 ± 31 months, 29 patients (10.9%) had a MACE. As compared to Group 1, MACE risk was significantly higher in Group 3 [hazard ratio (HR) 3.26; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-10.0] and Group 4 (HR 3.99; 95% CI 1.44-11.0), but not in Group 2 (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.54-3.96). In sub-analyses, LV end-systolic volume index after PCI was significantly higher in Group 4 than in the other groups and remained higher during follow-up. Combined LVEDP/LVEF assessment was useful in predicting MACE after successful PCI for STEMI patients and could facilitate risk stratification, as it predicts LV remodeling.

Indexed as

ForecastingAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPrognosisRetrospective StudiesST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionStroke VolumeVentricular Function, LeftVentricular RemodelingVentriculography, First-PassLeft ventricular ejection fractionLeft ventricular end-diastolic pressureLeft ventricular remodelingLeft ventriculogramST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.