Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29143101›Full record

ReviewArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2018

Candidate biomarkers in the cervical vaginal fluid for the (self-)diagnosis of cervical precancer.

Xaveer Van Ostade, Martin Dom, Wiebren Tjalma, Geert Van Raemdonck

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A DNA methylation assay (MPap) using self-collected tampon versus cytology collection swab for endometrial cancer detection.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Clinical Utility of Reflex Testing with Cancer Biomarkers to Improve Diagnostic Accuracy of Primary Human Papillomavirus Screening.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xaveer Van OstadeLaboratory of Protein Science, Proteomics and Epigenetic Signaling (PPES), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium. Xaveer.VanOstade@uantwerpen.be.ORCID 0000-0003-4078-3014
Martin DomLaboratory of Protein Science, Proteomics and Epigenetic Signaling (PPES), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Wiebren TjalmaGynecological Oncology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Multidisciplinary Breast Clinic, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium.
Geert Van RaemdonckLaboratory of Protein Science, Proteomics and Epigenetic Signaling (PPES), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.

Funding

Institute for Science and Technology Flanders (IWT) 093132Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) G.0597.13
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite improvement in vaccines against human papilloma virus (HPV), the causative agent of cervical cancer, screening women for cervical precancer will remain indispensable in the coming 30-40 years. A simple test that could be performed at home or at a doctor's practice and that informs the woman whether she is at risk would significantly help make a broader group of patients who aware that they need medical treatment. Cervical vaginal fluid (CVF) is a body fluid that is very well suited for such a test.

methodsNarrative review of cervical (pre)cancer candidate biomarkers from cervicovaginal fluid, is based on a detailed review of the literature. We will also discuss the possibilities that these biomarkers create for the development of a self-test or point-of-care test for cervical (pre)cancer.

resultsSeveral DNA, DNA methylation, miRNA, and protein biomarkers were identified in the cervical vaginal fluid; however, not all of these biomarkers are suited for development of a simple diagnostic assay.

conclusionsProteins, especially alpha-actinin-4, are most suited for development of a simple assay for cervical (pre)cancer. Accuracy of the test could further be improved by combination of several proteins or by combination with a new type of biomarker, e.g., originating from the cervicovaginal microbiome or metabolome.

Indexed as

AdultBiomarkers, TumorBody FluidsCervix UteriDNA MethylationFemaleHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedNeoplasm ProteinsPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsPrecancerous ConditionsUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaginaBiomarkers, TumorNeoplasm ProteinsBiomarkerCervical cancerCervical vaginal fluid

Identifiers

PMID29143101
PMCPMC5778162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.