Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29143099›Full record

ReviewHerzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie2017

[Left atrial appendage clusure in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation : Clinical evidence 2017].

Steffen Gloekler, Bajram Hajredini, Simon Rycerz, Sebastian Jäckle, Werner Jung

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 73% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Steffen GloeklerKlinik für Innere Medizin III, Kardiologie, Schwarzwald-Baar-Klinikum, 78052, Villingen-Schwenningen, Deutschland. steffen.gloekler@sbk-vs.de.
Bajram HajrediniKlinik für Innere Medizin III, Kardiologie, Schwarzwald-Baar-Klinikum, 78052, Villingen-Schwenningen, Deutschland.
Simon RycerzKlinik für Innere Medizin III, Kardiologie, Schwarzwald-Baar-Klinikum, 78052, Villingen-Schwenningen, Deutschland.
Sebastian JäckleKlinik für Innere Medizin III, Kardiologie, Schwarzwald-Baar-Klinikum, 78052, Villingen-Schwenningen, Deutschland.
Werner JungKlinik für Innere Medizin III, Kardiologie, Schwarzwald-Baar-Klinikum, 78052, Villingen-Schwenningen, Deutschland.
Schwarzwald-Baar Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia with a prevalence of 1-2% and affects approximately 15-20% of all octogenarians. Patients are at increased risk of thromboembolic stroke, with an overall risk of 5% per year. Thrombi form almost exclusively in the left atrial appendage (LAA), a blind sac-like heterogeneous structure trabeculated by pectinate muscles. In the past five decades, life-long oral anticoagulation (OAC) with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) has been the state-of-the art treatment to prevent stroke and systemic embolism from thrombi in AF. In the last decade, nonvitamin K dependent oral anticoagulants (NOAC) have been shown to be superior to VKA. Given the safety issues of indefinite OAC with either VKA or NOAC, it is plausible to consider left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) as an alternative strategy to prevent death, stroke or other systemic embolization, and bleeding. In recent years, LAAC has been compared to VKA in prospective randomized trials, yielding superior results regarding efficacy and noninferiority regarding safety in the mid-term. This review provides an update on the current state of LAAC in the field of prevention of death, stroke, and bleedings in patients suffering from nonvalvular AF. We elucidate the evidence and limitations of anticoagulation as the classical treatment paradigm, and review devices and techniques for LAAC. Most importantly, the current clinical evidence on efficacy and safety is outlined.

Indexed as

Atrial AppendageAtrial FibrillationStrokeAnticoagulantsHumansProspective StudiesAnticoagulantsAnticoagulationAtrial fibrillationBleedingLeft atrial appendage closureStroke

Identifiers

PMID29143099
OpenAlexW2770802513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.