Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29143092›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2018

Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Minimally Invasive Surgery Training Improves Outcomes in Basic Laparoscopic Procedures.

Katherine D Gray, Joshua G Burshtein, Lama Obeid, Maureen D Moore, Gregory Dakin, Alfons Pomp, Cheguevara Afaneh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Outcomes of Open and Laparoscopic Appendectomy With Single Endoloop Stump Closure.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katherine D GrayDepartment of Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital - Weill Cornell Medicine, 1300 York Ave, A1027, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Joshua G BurshteinDepartment of Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital - Weill Cornell Medicine, 1300 York Ave, A1027, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Lama ObeidDepartment of Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital - Weill Cornell Medicine, 1300 York Ave, A1027, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Maureen D MooreDepartment of Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital - Weill Cornell Medicine, 1300 York Ave, A1027, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Gregory DakinDepartment of Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital - Weill Cornell Medicine, 1300 York Ave, A1027, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Alfons PompDepartment of Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital - Weill Cornell Medicine, 1300 York Ave, A1027, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Cheguevara AfanehDepartment of Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital - Weill Cornell Medicine, 1300 York Ave, A1027, New York, NY, 10065, USA. cha9043@med.cornell.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo determine whether minimally invasive surgery (MIS) training improves outcomes in laparoscopic appendectomy, a procedure that is commonly performed in general surgery training.

methodsRetrospective review was conducted of all patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy for suspected acute appendicitis between 2014 and 2015 at a single-center, tertiary-care academic institution. Patients operated on by MIS-trained surgeons (MIS group) were compared to those operated on by general surgeons (GS group). Single-incision and multiport laparoscopic appendectomies were included; open approach, known malignancy, and interval appendectomies were excluded.

resultsA total of 507 patients were included in the study: 181 patients in the MIS group and 326 in the GS group. There were no differences in patient demographics or medical comorbidities between groups and most patients were ASA class 1 or 2. Patients operated on by MIS-trained surgeons had significantly shorter operative time (43 min, IQR 32-60 vs. 58 min, IQR 44-81; p < 0.001) and fewer intra-operative adverse events (0/181 vs. 8/326, 2.5%; p = 0.03). There was no difference in number of postoperative adverse events between groups (6/181, 3.3% vs. 21/326, 6.4%; p = 0.13). In the MIS group, subgroup analysis of single-incision versus multiport appendectomy showed no differences in intra-operative or postoperative adverse events. On multivariable linear regression, lack of MIS training and traditional multiport approach had the greatest effects on prolonging operative time (11.2 and 12.8 min, respectively; p = 0.001).

conclusionsMIS fellowship improves operative metrics and patient outcomes even in basic laparoscopy.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAppendectomyAppendicitisClinical CompetenceFellowships and ScholarshipsFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.